purahna

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

tankies are literally the ones who beat the Nazis though?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is the better way to write the law of course, but the ham-fisted way it's proposed by Rishi would look more like what I wrote, because he said specifically that the age should rise one year every year.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is an amazing, for the sole reason that everyone who is 17 and change now will turn 18, be able to smoke, the law will bump to 19, they won't be allowed to smoke any more, but then they'll turn 19 and they'll be able to smoke again until the law raises to 20...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Frankly, it's a great way to rule on such an important lawsuit if you're the one with the most bribe money. That's why the system is so great, for people with the most bribe money.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

fun little nugget of wisdom I uncovered reading about this, the Wikipedia page on Glyphosphate cites this metareview, the only metareview it cites finding that glyphosphate is not carcinogenic.

Look who wrote it.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

we literally have the highest per capita rate of prisoners on the planet??? you can literally look at a member of the government legal enforcement force wrong and get imprisoned??

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

absolutely innovative and pioneering humor. A stroke of genius. One of the most unique and original jokes I've heard in ages. You are truly a visionary.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Tiny Sistol makes some damn fine optics, that Tonk Borel barrel seems a little heavy for a handgun but it makes sense with the Belt Ammo and Blet Boo on the bottom

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is terf shit, right?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hate the culture of downvoting for simple questions that might seem obvious. If you're lurking and reading this, stop doing that.

My understanding is that no ISP makes it public that they block a large number of sites despite the fact that they are currently technically allowed to do so, but there are a number of isolated incidents of small and short-term access issues that may charitably be mistakes, and also throttling on a site-by-site basis does definitely exist and is employed by a number of ISPs. This regulation does more preventing a backslide into corporate rule and less uplifting our current conditions.

view more: ‹ prev next ›