They could easily make more money with the same image by limiting how much revenue goes to the charities. You can choose to not give them anything.
I'm not saying they aren't in it for the money. Most people need to make money to survive. But I think it's disingenuous to say they don't care at all. I think they do good and I feel many others agree.
A corporate marketing tool that costs such a large portion of your revenue is an inefficient tool. There must be some other value in it for them.
Honestly, I could see it being both. HB isn't entirely cold-hearted corporatism.
Oh boy, reddit is gaining in numbers on lemmy it seems. They can't have folks supporting lgbtq, amirite? That sounds just awful. Fuck people looking for acceptance and inclusivity. The "average hater" (not average lemmy user, let's get that straight) doesn't want to hear about that.
Let's keep this hate off Lemmy, OP.
If you're seeing that much noise, your tolerance is way too low and sounds more like you just are upset at seeing those opinions in general. Please tell me more about how you don't support those topics. I'm sure conversing with someone who hates an entire minority group is a fantastic conversationalist.
Enshitification is referring to something extremely specific and coined by Cory Doctorow. You can't just make up a new definition for it. That's a semantic fallacy.
This post seems like it was made by an "average reddit user" and not Lemmy.
I haven't seen that at all. Seems odd to suggest it's a problem on Lemmy.
Arquilian iirc. And I had the same though. It's like that alien is trying to tell others where the galaxy is.
I can't reason someone out of a position they didn't use reason to arrive at. That's an unfalsifiable claim. Yes, the US does things that won't hurt them and has been known to do things that help them. I'm sure you've done things that is in your best interest as well. That's a far cry from proof of terrorism. It's absolute insanity and conspiracy theory to make that jump. I'm not going to continue this discussion.
Thats a different problem and not even new. It's not even the same problem you referenced as the "key" part of the problem. Algorithms providing content is behind every mainstream platform ever.
I didn't say MSN is flawless. Just that people are really bad at determining responsibility for an issue.
They're also really bad at delineating the nuance of different root problems apparently.
MSN didn't write this. They are entirely responsible for that odd travel article not too long ago, but MSN is mostly just a news aggregator.
AI can very easily be abused and I don't see how this is related to the tech being open sourced or not. Fighting to ensure you aren't exploited is fine and I support anyone to fight against exploitation.