nsrxn

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (35 children)

Whatever “ism” you use, there will always be people at the top who are exploiting people at the bottom.

communism is classless. there is no top or bottom. same with anarchism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this hasn't been a conversation for hours

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I thought if you had read it this might be a worthwhile conversation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I wanted to see if it was worth continuing this conversation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I'm confident it is propaganda, but not having seen it, I don't know what politics it is pushing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

not having seen it, I obviously can't tell you what is messages are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I have no interest though. do you have a point?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (9 children)

have you read Foucault?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I'm not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I've seen in months.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

calling me names won't change the facts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn't actually support the claim that you're using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don't make the same very strong claim that you have.

edit: "them" was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›