overview for ndr

1

Is it possible to use Dolby Atmos AND Spatial Audio at the same time? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

0 comments fedilink

I can't understand if it just means that for some reason the settings cannot be changed (refer to the screenshot) or if it's because Dolby Atmos is disabled when Spatial Audio is on. I could not find any information about this anywhere.

Swap causing very slow boot (and systemd says the swap partition became active after 500k years) in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I might actually end up disabling swap in the end. I wanted to update that apparently I “fixed” the problem (not sure if permanently) by turning off the pc, unplugging the PSU, and holding down the power button for 30 seconds. Normal reboots weren’t enough. I’ll take it for now.

Swap causing very slow boot (and systemd says the swap partition became active after 500k years) in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I might actually end up disabling swap in the end. I wanted to update that apparently I “fixed” the problem (not sure if permanently) by turning off the pc, unplugging the PSU, and holding down the power button for 30 seconds. Normal reboots weren’t enough. I’ll take it for now.

24

Swap causing very slow boot (and systemd says the swap partition became active after 500k years) (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13313385

I'm dualbooting Fedora Kinoite (ublue-nvidia image) with Windows 11 and I have a boot time of over 1 minute (only on the Fedora side).

The output of systemd-analyze critical-chain is:

└─sddm.service @16.435s
  └─plymouth-quit.service @16.315s +107ms
    └─systemd-user-sessions.service @16.299s +12ms
      └─remote-fs.target @16.298s
        └─remote-fs-pre.target @16.298s
          └─nfs-client.target @16.298s
            └─gssproxy.service @16.288s +9ms
              └─network.target @16.285s
                └─wpa_supplicant.service @16.281s +4ms
                  └─basic.target @14.798s
                    └─dbus-broker.service @14.774s +22ms
                      └─dbus.socket @14.760s
                        └─sysinit.target @14.757s
                          └─systemd-resolved.service @14.696s +61ms
                            └─systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service @14.584s +96ms
                              └─local-fs.target @14.569s
                                └─run-user-1000-doc.mount @23.123s
                                  └─run-user-1000.mount @22.463s
                                    └─swap.target @1.410s
                                      └─dev-disk-by\x2duuid-819f25f8\x2daf77\x2d4d7b\x2daaf7\x2dadb07819a7b1.swap @1.276s +35ms
                                        └─dev-disk-by\x2duuid-819f25f8\x2daf77\x2d4d7b\x2daaf7\x2dadb07819a7b1.device @584542y 2w 2d 20h 46.792s +1min 3.997s

First of all, I would like to know what the hell is going on with that 584542 years active time lol

Anyway, the x2dadb07819a7b1 UUID belongs to the swap partition.

Output of lsblk -f:

NAME                                          FSTYPE      FSVER LABEL       UUID                                 FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS
zram0                                                                                                                           [SWAP]
nvme0n1                                                                                                                         
├─nvme0n1p1                                   vfat        FAT32 EFI         AAFB-90EA                             553.6M     7% /boot/efi
├─nvme0n1p2                                   ext4        1.0   fedora-boot a1457f7b-c1fb-40da-9c6f-98356d9003e2  526.8M    39% /boot
├─nvme0n1p3                                   ext4        1.0   fedora-root 0e748e63-f5f5-42f1-babd-818054eb9ee5   40.8G    35% /var
│                                                                                                                               /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora/var
│                                                                                                                               /usr
│                                                                                                                               /etc
│                                                                                                                               /
│                                                                                                                               /sysroot
├─nvme0n1p4                                   swap        1     fedora-swap 819f25f8-af77-4d7b-aaf7-adb07819a7b1                [SWAP]
├─nvme0n1p5                                   crypto_LUKS 2                 ea073ead-906c-4127-9555-efba204baabf                
│ └─luks-ea073ead-906c-4127-9555-efba204baabf ext4        1.0   fedora-home e37f299a-84f5-46ce-976c-507b8e8e25f8      1T     1% /var/home
├─nvme0n1p6                                   ntfs              Extra       74FE8F25FE8EDF2C                                    
├─nvme0n1p7                                                                                                                     
├─nvme0n1p8                                   BitLocker   2                                                                     
└─nvme0n1p9                                   ntfs                          C02807922807869E

What should I do?

16

Swap causing very slow boot (and systemd says the swap partition became active after 500k years) (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink

I'm dualbooting Fedora Kinoite (ublue-nvidia image) with Windows 11 and I have a boot time of over 1 minute (only on the Fedora side).

The output of systemd-analyze critical-chain is:

└─sddm.service @16.435s
  └─plymouth-quit.service @16.315s +107ms
    └─systemd-user-sessions.service @16.299s +12ms
      └─remote-fs.target @16.298s
        └─remote-fs-pre.target @16.298s
          └─nfs-client.target @16.298s
            └─gssproxy.service @16.288s +9ms
              └─network.target @16.285s
                └─wpa_supplicant.service @16.281s +4ms
                  └─basic.target @14.798s
                    └─dbus-broker.service @14.774s +22ms
                      └─dbus.socket @14.760s
                        └─sysinit.target @14.757s
                          └─systemd-resolved.service @14.696s +61ms
                            └─systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service @14.584s +96ms
                              └─local-fs.target @14.569s
                                └─run-user-1000-doc.mount @23.123s
                                  └─run-user-1000.mount @22.463s
                                    └─swap.target @1.410s
                                      └─dev-disk-by\x2duuid-819f25f8\x2daf77\x2d4d7b\x2daaf7\x2dadb07819a7b1.swap @1.276s +35ms
                                        └─dev-disk-by\x2duuid-819f25f8\x2daf77\x2d4d7b\x2daaf7\x2dadb07819a7b1.device @584542y 2w 2d 20h 46.792s +1min 3.997s

First of all, I would like to know what the hell is going on with that 584542 years active time lol

Anyway, the x2dadb07819a7b1 UUID belongs to the swap partition.

Output of lsblk -f:

NAME                                          FSTYPE      FSVER LABEL       UUID                                 FSAVAIL FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS
zram0                                                                                                                           [SWAP]
nvme0n1                                                                                                                         
├─nvme0n1p1                                   vfat        FAT32 EFI         AAFB-90EA                             553.6M     7% /boot/efi
├─nvme0n1p2                                   ext4        1.0   fedora-boot a1457f7b-c1fb-40da-9c6f-98356d9003e2  526.8M    39% /boot
├─nvme0n1p3                                   ext4        1.0   fedora-root 0e748e63-f5f5-42f1-babd-818054eb9ee5   40.8G    35% /var
│                                                                                                                               /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora/var
│                                                                                                                               /usr
│                                                                                                                               /etc
│                                                                                                                               /
│                                                                                                                               /sysroot
├─nvme0n1p4                                   swap        1     fedora-swap 819f25f8-af77-4d7b-aaf7-adb07819a7b1                [SWAP]
├─nvme0n1p5                                   crypto_LUKS 2                 ea073ead-906c-4127-9555-efba204baabf                
│ └─luks-ea073ead-906c-4127-9555-efba204baabf ext4        1.0   fedora-home e37f299a-84f5-46ce-976c-507b8e8e25f8      1T     1% /var/home
├─nvme0n1p6                                   ntfs              Extra       74FE8F25FE8EDF2C                                    
├─nvme0n1p7                                                                                                                     
├─nvme0n1p8                                   BitLocker   2                                                                     
└─nvme0n1p9                                   ntfs                          C02807922807869E

What should I do?

OpenAI introduces Sora, its text-to-video AI model in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I can't understand how the shadows and reflections are so accurate (not perfect, but convincing) like here or here.

OpenAI introduces Sora, its text-to-video AI model in c/[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago (5 children)

This is so much better than all text-to-video models currently available. I'm looking forward to read the paper but I'm afraid they won't say much about how they did this. Even if the examples are cherry picked, this is mind blowing!