madjo

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Hatred for anything not Republican by MAGA and their brainwashed followers. That's what's keeping Donald T. still in the race.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

This is good precedence for Imane Khelif

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Make love not war!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I love this, but holy crap it's difficult! Sadly, 0 points

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, I'm actively shopping for an EV and Tesla is not on the list. Not just because of Elmo though. I need physical buttons for the AC and radio and I like my cars to be pretty. But Elmo is definitely another reason why I'm not even looking at a Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You two are fun, guys!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

AI wrote this response:

Consumed by AI? More like 'AI-dentified'! At this point, even my toaster is getting in on the indexing action. 🍞🤖

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not really, as X refused to argue it in court, the place where this argument should have taken place.

Whatever we Lemmings think about this ruling is unimportant to the actual rulers. We can argue about that till we're blue in the face, but it won't change a thing. So it's pointless.

X had a chance to assount legal representation. They refused, and as a consequence, the entire website got blocked. It's their own fault.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The censorship you're talking about, was about 6 or 7 accounts that were instrumental in instigating a January 6 style coup attempt in favour of the previous president who lost the election. Those accounts were causing unrest among the population, and were calling for violence in the streets.

Brazil doesn't look too kindly to that, given its history. They wanted those accounts banned. And instead of arguing the legality of banning those accounts in court, musk decided to get all of Twitter/X banned in Brazil.

In other words, it's Twitter/X's own fault. They could've appointed legal representation and tried to argue that banning those accounts amounted to illegal censorship, but instead of trying that they stuck their head in the sand, like an ostrich, hoping it would blow over, by closing the offices in Brazil and refusing to appoint such legal representation. Leaving the courts no choice but to ban all of Twitter/X.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Had X wanted to argue this in court, they should've appointed legal representation, instead of closing all of their Brazil offices.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

And musk is idiot for refusing to appoint legal representation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

If musk and X wanted to argue that in court, they could've appointed legal representation in Brazil. Instead, ol' musky closed down the Brazil offices of X, like the braindead weirdo that he is.

As we say in my country, the person who burns his own butt, has to sit on the blisters.

view more: ‹ prev next ›