To use more inclusive language, of course. That's what we're all doing now isn't it?
letsgo
joined 1 year ago
A transparent ad centred on your mouse cursor.
That's not a real operator. You've put a space in "i--" and removed the space in "-- >". The statement is "while i-- is greater than zero". Inventing an unnecessary "goes to" operator just confuses beginners and adds something else to think about while debugging.
And yes I have seen beginners try to use <-- and --<. Just stop it.
If they have value to the company then how about sharing the costs of commuting? A 50-50 split seems reasonable to me. The company gets the value of those conversations, and the plebs get some help with all that fuel they now have to buy, at ridiculous prices due to high oil prices.
The ultimate "lalala I'm not listening". What a fucking crybaby.
That's a great plan! Do be sure to let us all know how it goes.
The question isn't aimed at proudboys but at you, calling use of the Karen name "underlying red herring sexism" but then demonstrating your own not so underlying but explicit red herring sexism with the use of "gun toting proudboys." Unless you were being ironic of course.
Hmm I smell another "DeCSS" coming along...
True but the sentiment is real. It's only a matter of time before Discord enshittifies and people need to stop being dependent on it.
Could you clarify why "gun toting proudboys" isn't sexist?
A programmer's pet peeve is someone who says "why can't you just...".
But the fundamental problem with your plan, assuming it's possible at all - it's been said that if the brain were simple enough for us to understand then we'd be too simple to understand it - is that you're going to want to make your AI at least as smart as someone who's 30-40 years old, which by definition would take 30-40 years.
Also by claiming "developing nation", which is up to the nation to decide for themselves instead of having someone else decide for them, the planet's second largest economy gets to claim WTO rules that the recipient (country) pays delivery. That's why you can buy something from China for $1.50 and yet it costs $150 to send it back if it doesn't work.