kolektyw_szmer

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It does not. Other then running a private/closed instance there's really no way to limit input from anyone with an account.

 

We had a random post in an anarchist community on our Polish speaking instance. Some 45 English speaking accounts came out of nowhere to downvote it, with a single one engaging in discussion. None of them were ever active on the instance, nor particularly in this community. Seems they just followed every crosspost.
Mods could not really do anything about it, so the accounts were banned from the entire instance by admins, as this was considered hostile behaviour against our community.
Which rises the question; should people be able to vote, end specially downvote, in communities they are not a part of? Maybe this could be at least a setting?

Another interesting concept that came from the discussion over that was "constructive downvote" - requirement of commenting why one downvotes a post.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So, are the other 2 accounts who upvoted this bot's or just stupid?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

We're working on that, but not there yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It could be a page on the instance with half based on a form to be filled out in the admin pages, and the other half with Lemmy funding.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A shared donation page might encourage them to promote it. One where there would be all lemmy dev funding options, but admins could also add theirs. Sounds like a low hanging fruit.

We'll also discuss announcing a cut of our donations going upstream in our collective.