This takes time and a lot more money. It's something we should do in parallel, but even if we started this today, any EV sold in the next decade would be long off the road before sizable impactful progress had been made on 15min cities.
joshhsoj1902
joined 1 year ago
I'm not sure I agree there is a massive infrastructure need. The average American could keep their EV charged today with a standard 120v outlet.
I don't have numbers for how any car owners park their car overnight somewhere that has access to a 120v plug, but it would surprise me if it was less than 50%.
Batteries are fine today and I lay getting better, fast charging is nice to have, but definitely not needed.
This isn't an unsolvable problem though given demand.
Assuming you're in an appartment with dedicated parking, it's not crazy difficult or expensive to install some lvl 2 chargers, the real blocker here is demand, if residents aren't demanding it the building isn't going to supply it.
If you're stuck with street parking, you're right, your use case isn't best suited for EVs right now. But this case also isn't a huge portion of vehicle owners, so it doesn't seem like justification to stop rollout.
This Samsung app is the one thing I need to actually switch my family over to jellyfin.
I could do the workaround for myself, but I'm not doing it for others.
So for now I'm the only jellyfin user
Fastmail & my own domain
It is insiane to me that Google shows these ads to google one subscribers.
I already pay google hundreds of dollars a year, and have done so for years. then over the last 2 yesr they slowly started rolling out intrusive ads into my mobile Gmail app.
It was the final straw for me. I've started slowing migrating my email off Gmail, but my goodness is that ever a slow and painful process.
What part wasn't worth it? You said it's not worth it, then made it sound worth it.
The ROI is 10-25 years based on the electricity prices you locked in at the start.
With regular inflation, and general increases in the electricity rates, over the long run you're going to save money. The return might not be investment market level returns, but if you can justify the up front costs it's unlikely to not come out ahead.
It has made music streaming cheaper.
If you don't like Spotify or feel it's too expensive, do a google search, there are like a dozen alternatives, most of them cheaper.
For Spotify you're paying for one of the better user experiences.
Like I said, you're sooooo close to understanding
You're sooooo close.
I want tech companies to create streaming services.
I want content companies to make content.
AKA removing the monopoly.
Neither?
I would rather have 20 services, all with access to most of the same content.
Some services give you the option to pick and choose which media packages you want.
These services are now able to compete on a mostly even ground in terms of content, and instead there is an incentive for them to provide a good user experience.
This would also encourage the media companies to stop licencing their content exclusively or as upfront large blocks, and instead per/stream style licensing could show up (where a content owner is paid based off how much their content is watched).
This would then encourage media companies to produce content people want to watch, rather than the last 10 years where the priority is to have larger libraries of exclusive content (even if that content isn't good).
None of that is a given if content companies didn't also own the streaming companies, but it's is the sort of market that had the best version of Netflix (before they were making content their user experience was much better).
We're still looking at a monopoly from the perspective of accessing particular content.
We would all be more happier if the video streaming platforms operated closer to the music platforms where all platforms had mostly the same content, and we just got to pick the experience we want.
As is there is no choise if you're looking for something in particular, which is pretty similar to a monopoly.
Not really though.
If the grid is powered completely by coal, and the government has no plans to phase out said coal and the grid is going to stay all coal for the next 30 years. Then yes, in that case EVs aren't a great choice.
But like anything else and the "but the grid is currently not clean" arguments don't really hold water.