ji59

I believe it it were illegal, it wouldn't be so popular and people would have to hide it more. Illegality would bring more barriers to use it and since people are lazy less poeple would be interested.

But personally I think the solution is for people to stop being so sensitive to nudity. If someone would post naked pictures of me I wouldn't be happy, but either devastated. And if it were AI generated I could simply avoid it by saying that ain't me.

Isn't Smite exactly this?

There are always a lot of people to fuck. But these two are dragging their population to unnecessary war.

Why nobody thinks about the stakeholders?
We have seen in Africa that children don't have to have lunch. But stakeholders are the real victims

Fuck Putin and fuck Netanyahu

NewPipe works by fetching the required data from the official API (e.g. PeerTube) of the service you're using. If the official API is restricted (e.g. YouTube) for our purposes, or is proprietary, the app parses the website or uses an internal API instead. This means that you don't need an account on any service to use NewPipe.

So NewPipe doesn't use yt API and it never accepted its terms, so NewPipe is safe (from my understanding)

...PUBLISHES OR DISTRIBUTES MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS ON THE INTERNET FROM A WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS...
Since furry porn isn't harmful, they should be ok.

I would say streaming services are worse then sailing these days, shitty quality, unusable offline play,... And buying movies isn't easy too, unless you want to buy BluRay discs most of online places will only lend you a licence to watch the content until they decide to remove it, viz Sony.

I know that POC lived in England and it was possible to meet someone like that. But I would prefer if the model gave most possible, most general answers. If I ask for an image of a car I would like to give me four-wheeled red or gray or green car, not three-wheeled pink car just because there exist some car like that.

The problem is that these answers are hugely incorrect and if some child learning about history of England would see this, they would create bias that England was always diverse.
The same is true for some recent post, where people knowing nothing about Scotland history could learn from images that half of Scotland population in 18th century was black.
So from my perspective these images are just completely wrong and it should be fixed.
Also if you want diversity, what about handicapped people?

The Simpsons or ads?

Never heard of RISC-V?