I've never found Bing chat to match up with the free ChatGPT. It often just refuses to answer my question while ChatGPT will at least take a guess and give me something to work with.
howrar
joined 1 year ago
I've noticed that it sometimes smells like epoxy glue. I wonder if we're thinking of the same scent.
Quickly filtering out a subset of them to prioritize so that we get the most value possible out of the time that humans spend on it.
LLMs cannot:
- Tell fact from fiction
- Accurately recall data from its training set
- Count
LLMs can
- Translate
- Get the general vibe of a text (sentiment analysis)
- Generate plausible text
Semantics aside, they're very different skills that require different setups to accomplish. Just because counting is an easier task than analysing text for humans, doesn't mean it's the same it's the same for a LLM. You can't use that as evidence for its inability to do the "harder" tasks.
Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.
It certainly would be. Thankfully, there's many more than zero human eyes involved in this.
Considering that it's a language task, LLMs exist, and the cost, it's a reasonable assumption. It'd be pretty silly to analyse a bag of words when you have tools you can use with minimal work with much better results. Even sillier to spend over $200 for something that can be run on a decade old machine in a few hours.
Yeah, this sounds like something I'd find at a diner.
As if he didn't already have them
Possible. I haven't been following them that closely.
Not just afford a one bedroom apartment. They should be able to do so and also afford to go to work. You can get housing for next to nothing in bumfuck nowhere, but if you can't get to work while living there, then there's no point.
Exactly
Could you process it further and package it up to sell as salt? Or is this not the same thing as table salt?