fox_the_apprentice

get’s [sic] a lot of downvotes by people who simply don’t like that particular post.

That's literally the point of the downvote system. To downvote posts you don't like, or you feel are out of place.

Additionally we are seeing posts with more downvotes than a community has subscribers, meaning people are downvoting content they don’t even want to see in the first place.

This seems to be the real issue you're trying to fight. It seems like only permitting downvotes on communities that the user has been a part of for greater than 1/2/7/30/pick-a-number days would be the proper solution. If people in a community are downvoting a post, then it means they don't think that post is worth sharing. No admin, moderator, community owner, etc. should be able to change that.

I am strongly against removing downvotes.

Underscores do not separate words when moving with ctrl+arrow key. Hypens are preferable, or periods, or spaces.

From what I understand, history has proven otherwise. Wars are always very profitable for certain groups.

Epic Games*, Mihoyo**, IO Interactive, Bethesda/ZeniMax***, Deep Silver.

* Epic games is 40% owned by a publicly-traded company, Tencent.

** Mihoyo filed for an IPO in 2017, but withdrew its application for unknown reasons.

*** ZeniMax Media was recently acquired by Microsoft, and is now a Microsoft subsidiary. I'm not sure if this makes it count as a 'non-public gaming company' by your definition.

dwalinIsEven(-2)

Thank you for providing a source!

Microsoft makes some very good quality adaptive controller accessories. IMO that still doesn't make this move OK, but at least disabled people still have a supported option.

https://www.xbox.com/en-US/accessories/controllers/xbox-adaptive-controller

For those like me who have no idea what EUIPO is:

EUIPO stands for the EU Intellectual Property Office.

Since 2012, the EUIPO has hosted the European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights, which brings public and private stakeholders together in the fight against piracy and counterfeiting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Intellectual_Property_Office

Ads that permit code to run locally are a security hazard. That's most ad platforms.

I'd deal with intrusive ads just fine (and when I was younger I used to), but I run an adblocker and noscript for security reasons. Unobtrusive ads don't change that for me.

A lot of the comments in here seem a little bit too sympathetic

It is a mental illness. If fake images result in less real-world abuse then that's a good thing.

the lack of new first party exclusives

This is good; exclusivity hurts consumers.

Suddenly corporations have to pay them a wage and medical care. Brilliant.