neither. 0.0% chance for either candidate.
This level of cynicism is unwarranted. Sure it might be low, but for Harris it's at least 0.1%.
forrcaho
joined 1 year ago
Weird to use an obscure source to report that Axios (a reasonably well known web presence) reported about this. A moment's search turned up the original Axios article.
I hear you, but please still get out and vote for Harris/Walz this November. This is about keeping the infrastructure of representative democracy in place so we will be able to work towards those needed changes. If Trump wins, all that is going away, and those of us guilty of thought crimes such as believing in global warming will end up in prison at best.
I don't know how he would ever have expected anything different from Netanyahu. It's not like this is the first time he failed to show the "restraint" Biden pleaded for (while simultaneously providing him with an unlimited supply of weapons).
So, giving you what I called the choice dialog. That makes sense. Intent intercept wouldn't help then, it would just give you one more basically irrelevant choice to do all the things (although it's useful for developers).
Is it actually opening up the Sprinkler app for all those other purposes, or giving you a choice dialog? If it's actually opening up the app, maybe installing Intent Intercept would at least make it a choice dialog, as it also tries to open everything (just to show information about the request; it's a dev tool).
For me, Salvador Dali's work transformed from fascinating into kitsch when I learned he was a fascist.
You've always got to show up for those school board elections now. Every. Single. Time.
No, Aileen Cannon is presiding over the case about retaining secret documents in Florida (and IIRC, she's already dismissed it and that decision is being appealed). This "conspired to overthrow the government" case is in Washington DC and is presided over by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is treating it seriously.
Wouldn't a Satanic portal be below the White House?
view more: next ›
Yeah, money is a social construct; it's really just numbers in computers. We can redefine capital to be numbers that actually make sense ... uh, theoretically.