To spare others the same googling: 175f = 79.4c, 180f = 82.2c.
What you're doing is called cupping! I've seen it used mostly to set up tastings of multiple different coffees at once. Generally it's recommended to stir the crust at some point so that the grounds fall to the bottom of the cup. Also, you're brewing at a pretty low temp though. Even for dark roasts, I would consider brewing a touch hotter and see what you think.
1zpresso released the J-ultra a few months ago, which is just a J-max with slightly smaller adjustments and something like a 1/6th lighter. It's highly regarded for espresso and does a great job for filter coffee. But it definitely creates more fines than a grinder specifically for filter coffee, so heads up there.
Might be too coarse. I think Hoffmann recommends a much finer grind than what people normally recommend for French press, something closer to medium than anything that would be called coarse. Might be worth grinding finer and keeping everything else the same, then see what happens.
Haha same! There's a place for us though: if you ever get into research, robotic writing tends to work out fairly well!
Sounds like the intro paragraph to someone's term paper at uni.
Ah gotcha; that's helpful. That's not been my understanding of this content, so I'll have to look into that, thanks.
You say it's a copyright license, and I think that's exactly where I'm struggling with this. My understanding is that this is a license for something copyrighted or otherwise protected. Copyright protects things from their creation. A copyright license provides certain people action that would otherwise be denied by copyright. So are you saying that your understanding is that what we write here on Lemmy is copyrighted, with authors holding the rights? That would be helpful to know because that has not been my understanding of copyright (and I know country plays an important role here), so that would be interesting to look into.
Oh I clicked the link, mate, and read through a couple links deep. What I'm saying is that my understanding of the license is that it allows permissions for a restricted item, but it does not restrict an item with open permissions. You know what I mean? You need to be a rights holder of something that is protected by copyright or the like, and then you can use this license to open permissions in certain ways, in this case that the item can be used for non-commercial means. So this wouldn't work with stuff on Lemmy, right?
My understanding of the Creative Commons licenses is that they are for providing permission to people to use something that they wouldn't be able to otherwise, due to copyright or other issues. I don't think the licenses are capable of limiting what people can do with something if it's already the wild west, or do I have that wrong?
The sword of Damocles hung only by a single hair.
Or Paragon even. That game was so fun back in the day before it got killed. If anyone can make something that fun again, it's probably Valve.