damnedfurry

The vast majority of consumers of the vast majority of companies' products are completely in the dark about the demographic makeup of its workforce, so even the possibility of this being a factor is minuscule.

So you admit that you were lying here.

Companies supporting LGBT matters is a good litheness test

Then they're often obese as fuck, lol

This kind of discrimination is literally anti-capitalist. If maximizing profit is the goal, refusing someone for any reason unrelated to how good a worker they'd be (a category everything in the HRC falls under) is counter-productive.

It sounds to me as though you have weird fantasies about libertarians, lol

Fact: Bigotry is hate. Fact: Assuming someone is a liar based on their job is textbook bigotry.

Therefore, yes, it's based on hate.

ACABers are so obsessed with their prejudicial hate that they actually happily swallowed the complete fabrication in the OP's title, and ACTUALLY convinced themselves that cops saw someone jump a turnstile and their initial immediate reaction was to open fire on them, lmao.

My man I don't think I give a shit where you think I belong.

Looks at the number of people that got shot.

Obviously that’s not true.

Not as a result of two people walking, but as a result of someone brandishing a knife and attempting murder in a public place. Cringe goalpost move.

And all of that stuff with the weapon is based only on the police claims.

And all of what you're saying is based on literally nothing but your hate boner for police, lmao.

The image released shows a knife clutched in the criminal's hand. I'm sure he was strolling around like that very innocently and cops just opened fire on him for a laugh, right?

The straw-grasping is incredible.

The same police that won’t release the body camera footage.

Like it'd matter to your type. We have extensive hard video evidence of what happened with Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, all put online publicly mere days after the event, and there are still innumerable imbeciles claiming shit it directly contradicts happened, lol.

$1000 says there is no amount of examples of trustworthiness you could be shown that would change your mind, just admit what you are, don't be prejudiced and too much of a wimp to admit it.

Don't see how that's relevant to anything. A police officer walking after another person, on foot, doesn't have the potential for collateral damage that a car chase does.

It is completely ridiculous to frame this as "police shot a man over $2.90", when the shooting only happened after a verbal death threat, brandishing a lethal weapon, followed by an overt attempt to make good on that threat with that weapon.

Only the most ACAB-addled mind would think it appropriate to frame the events that way.

show me some billionaires that never took advantage of anyone to get their billions

You can't prove a negative, screwball. It's literally impossible to prove "never took advantage of anyone" about anyone, billionaire or not.

Not that you aren't almost certainly using an overbroad definition of 'take advantage', on top of it.

I'm down to change my view.

No, you aren't. People who are don't play these kinds of semantic games.

I just don’t see getting to a billion without someone being taken advantage of on the way though.

Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's false.