daikiki

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago

"Then it is settled," Elrond said at last. "You shall be the Squadron of the Ring."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

You should have taken them to itty bitty claims court.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

France is a Schengen country. There are no meaningful border controls. He could literally take public transport all the way back to the Russian border without ever pulling his ID out of his pocket. And he probably will.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

Rest in Peace, Lt. Ogawa.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What they probably mean is they're trying to get a passport for their child and the passport office has told them that that's no problem at all. In fact, all they need is a copy of the child's birth certificate.

[–] [email protected] 145 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just pack the goddamn court. There's ONE conservative justice on the Supreme Court who was appointed by a president who came to power having received more votes than his opponent, and that's Clarence Thomas, the man whose loyalties can be bought with a luxury vacation and whose wife aided and abetted insurrectionist traitors.

The ENTIRE conservative wing of the Supreme Court is illegitimate. Every single one of them. And you know what? Thanks to the GOP, it only takes 50 votes to approve a supreme court justice. It used to be sixty, but they changed the rules so they could more conveniently destroy America.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago

That's . . . not what cute means.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What does it mean when the highest court in your ostensible democracy is this obviously compromised?

I mean morally it's obvious. Their judgements are invalid. Useless. Feel free to ignore anything they say if you can get away with it. But unless we're down for anarchy, what means do we have to deal with this? Legally the president can pack the court. So long as he can get the senate to go along. But he doesn't seem to want to, and there are no viable alternatives to the president we have. Not yet, anyway.

So here we are. A 'democracy' with a supreme court that's openly compromised, if not outright corrupt. Nobody's running on a 'maybe the supreme court shouldn't be filled with 18th century ideologues and grifters' platform. Nobody's talking about upside down flags and RVs on the major networks.

So what do?

view more: next ›