chatokun

In the distant future, the year 2000:

There is no more unethical treatment of the elephants
Well, there's no more elephants, so

Ooh, new Zahn books?

Racists, and or people who don't care about people and want to revel in it. For some people, doing such vile things gets them off.

I do see it, but consistently call it out if I can. I like to use the example of POGS if anything regarding viral trends or whatever comes up. POGS were just printed pieces of cardboard that encouraged gambling, and we morons ate that shit up.

I had to go to the site to read the final one only for it to ask me why I bothered.

The missing arm is icing on the cake, even if it wasn't intentional.

Gender neutral, but forgot their existed.

My brother had to tell me this when I needed food stamps after a decade of working, but felt embarrassed. They really pulled one on us.

Having used all 3 and not totally hating any of them, all the Windows ones I agree with, the two Linux ones that isn't old computer I agree with, and I only agree with the money one for Mac. I don't have an issue with Mac OS more than Windows OS, but it is way overpriced. At least with Windows I haven't actually paid Microsoft much on thet front. Though if you add in other MS products then we're back to being screwed.

Ha, jokes on them, I don't make posts.

I mean, I agree, to an extent. As someone else pointed out, the cross banning would never work out in the US, and that shows the difference in how both things are treated here.

So, we can ban crosses? I'm obviously going a bit far, but both somewhat touch on the way people believe rights should be secured, and both involve human rights (one to free expression of religion, another to life and fr33dom from unfair treatment in general). Both make statements to others that others may find uncomfortable, depending on their beliefs.