Right? It's obviously an orchard, not a forest, and obviously the apples are one of the popular commercial cultivars rather than some wild natural variant.
charonn0
joined 1 year ago
Sounds like a fatal problem. That's a shame.
Which is exactly why the output of an AI trained on copyrighted inputs should not be copyrightable. It should not become the private property of whichever company owns the language model. That would be bad for a lot more reasons than the potential for laundering open source code.
The part that you're apparently having trouble understanding is that a language model is not a human mind and a human mind is not a language model.
If it's not infringement to input copyrighted materials, then it's not infringement to take the output.
Copyright can be enforced at both ends or neither end, not one or the other.
It's an extraordinary example of Hodgkin's Law of parallel planetary development that the Ferengi symbol for "bars of gold pressed latinum" is also the ancient Earth dollar sign.
I was framed for assassinating a politician and sent to Rura Penthe. Gowron got me $5,000!
I tend to support this idea. If inputting copyrighted materials isn't infringement then neither should taking the output be.
The closest I can think of--at least as far as multi-generation epics--would be Wilbur Smith novels.