beteljuice
So he won 300k for being violently attacked but I'm wrong that he was violently attacked. Ok.
And you're a fucking idiot.
It's clear from their comment that they are referring to the well known physically violent attack against Ngo, and that they are claiming that Ngo is not the victim here. It's not theoretical astrophysics, read the comment again. What's with the abject denialism here?
Regarding your other comments, I know what that means, I was just preemptively calling out potential BS responses, because they were used multiple times before on this very Lemmy instance by others defending the violence against Ngo.
Anger and violence are two different things bud.
No one is living 100% to ideological perfection. It's a spectrum. Some are a lot closer than others. I've definitely met some ascetic non-judgemental types.
I agree with you, but you will get shut down because it hurts the narrative. Those terms will be called "dog whistles" or something stupid like that.
I'm arguing AGAINST violence. I'm a pacifist. And I'm tired of being called right wing or fascist everytime I argue for pacificism, when I couldn't be any further from the right wing. It's insanity. Have you said anything to the violence supporters in this thread?