bananabenana

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It doesn't seem like the author of the article did any basic statistics to prove this point? What is the R2 and P value of these scatter plots? Are these even linear relationships?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Lots of people carry it asymptomatically, which is how it spreads. Its not a moral failing on your end. If you were a carrier already, it may be a sign that your immune system had a downturn for a while. Or you may have contracted one from someone else which was slightly different and your immune system has to update it's adaptive response to the new variant

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Everyone is always talking about spider silk as ropes. What about DNA huh? Mass strawberry extraction for a DNA space elevator when?

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Taking the time to learn gimp is worthwhile. Its really powerful once you know how to use it IMO

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Is this loss?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Absolutely not true. Fungi are weird but not this weird. Citation please

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Tbh I'm here for it. The reboot trilogy is legitimately fantastic and beautifully realised films

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Three robust genetics papers using different sequences and genes, each time place it as a sister group to Archosauria:

248 nuclear genes (187,026 nucleotide sites): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3473239/

1145 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their variable flanking DNA: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331

1,113 single-copy coding genes, robustly indicated that turtles are likely to be a sister group of crocodilians and birds: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.2615

This level of genetic evidence is an overwhelmingly strong signal, regarding relationships and recent common ancestry to extant species. I would say it is undeniably strong. You cannot possibly get evolutionary convergence over this many genetic loci.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe we're not talking about the same thing? I was thinking about the diapsid debate, where genetic evidence is overwhelmingly strong in favour for diapsid evolution Mitochondrial DNA evidence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC24355/ Micro RNA evidence: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21775315/

Tbh a core multi gene ML tree to all other reptiles would prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt, maybe someone's done that already but I haven't been able to find it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Origin of life matters to a lot of people I think. RNA vs other self-replicating molecules? Moon-based tidal PCR? Cell formation etc.

view more: next ›