agamemnonymous

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And you decided lesser evil wasn't lesser enough? Now we get greater evil.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I've long ascribed to the theory that, if time travel is ever invented, no one kills Hitler because WWII was inevitable and Hitler actually bungled a lot of key decisions. I'm praying Trump is the same. Maybe this is the most painless purging of nationalist sentiment across the timelines.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

And we'll get to see what the alternative provides. Yay, you won.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

What? No it isn't. Fascism is fascism, neo-liberalism is neo-liberalism. You can certainly make a compelling argument that neo-liberalism eventually begets fascism. But fascism is already fascism, it's not waiting to be begotten.

When the viable options are the road to fascism, or the destination itself, non-fascists are best served choosing the road. At least on the road you have a chance of slowing down or steering down an alternate road, or even turning around as remote as that possibility is. When you're at the destination, it's too late.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

How I "want" you to vote is pragmatically. If you vote 3rd party in a FPTP election, you're pragmatically indistinguishable from a non-voter.

If you're a leftist, the pragmatic strategy is to recognize the ratchet effect and vote for the "halt movement" party over the "full send fascism" party. It's much easier to push leftist policies and promote leftist representatives under a neo-liberal regime than under a fascist one. At the absolute minimum the neo-liberals decelerate the plunge into fascism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Help me parse this logic. I'm having trouble figuring out how "Leftists are much too small and insignificant a demographic to make a meaningful difference in elections, therefore Democrats should implement leftist political strategy" makes any sense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

If they didn't vote, they're not a voter. Non-voters get their fair share of the blame, and non-voters who want to complain get shamed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I guess we'll get to find out if there is such a thing as "worse genocide"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Write your representatives and encourage your friends to do the same. It's a frequent topic of conversation, it only gets pushed louder in election years because people keep insisting on voting 3rd party in a FPTP election.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Don Beyer(D) proposed the Fair Representation Act in 2017 that included implementing RCV for electing representatives to the House.

It's much easier to sell a national popular vote, since people are used to popular votes already. RCV will be much easier to push federally when there are plenty of states that use it locally. Until then it's largely a non-starter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Democrats have been behind, or at least caucused to support, most of the RCV initiatives that have been put forward.

 

Looks innocuous enough at first glance right? Let's zoom in on the problem:

These don't go together. If the semicircle on the left is correct, then this is showing moon phases, and the symbol on the right should be of a gibbous moon:

If the cookie-with-a-bite-taken-out in the right is correct, then this is showing an eclipse, and the symbol on the left should be of a 50% partial eclipse:

It drives me crazy every time I look at it.

view more: next ›