abfarid

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (6 children)

They would just build climate-controlled domes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Then I misunderstood and was thinking of a different adjustment of the head. The one I was thinking about us when you wedge the screwdriver behind the head and bend it otwards a little for better contact. For that you need a flat tool.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't you use a flathead for that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Uses Too Many Big Words

Contention

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (12 children)

How can one be chronologically disappointed? Did you mean "chronically"?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I have 1GB/m and rarely use half of it. I just don't watch YT when I'm outside. And it's plenty for looking at beans on Lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

It was obviously sarcasm with that 100ths precision rating.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Your mom ends in butt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not criticizing the screens, they are ok and I loved my Pebble Time Steel until the battery swelled and popped off the screen. I'm just saying that calling these e-paper is a deceptive marketing strategy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

From the Verge article:

The first watch that Migicovsky and Core plan to ship is called the Core 2 Duo (not to be confused with the old Intel processor), which Migicovsky says will cost $149 and will ship in July. [...] It has the exact same black-and-white e-paper display as the old Pebble 2 (technically a transflective LCD, if you’re curious)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn't a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it's not "categorically" wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›