Wispy2891

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Such a reaction is insane, in other countries they would be prosecuted, right?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So if they purchased Ring cameras that are feeding everything to American AWS servers it would be ok?

Seems stupid that in a military install they're using cloud shit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

On this phone (secondary, work only) i decided to live without AdBlock to remind me how cancerous are some websites

Or maybe I'm just masochistic

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's supposed to have an article somewhere here?

ads cover the entire screen except a single sentence

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

not a technical but you can't just do full disk encryption and put the password manually at every single boot?

It seems very unlikely that a reputable hosting company would snoop even in that case

If we're talking about 3 letter agencies, for the dedicated servers they'll directly seize the disks...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

With that shortcut only a tiny run window will appear and not the scary terminal

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every IT company now: we should increase our server costs by 100x to offer unwanted gimmicks that users don't want and aren't willing to pay

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

There's a way to revert it in w11?

At work i need to constantly switch users and even if it's a domain account, the placeholder for the m365 ads is still there. I need a extra click every time i need to logout

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, it only affects vanilla apks where the dev implemented the check. For some reason the dev might forbid to run the app to users that side loaded the app instead of getting it from play store

Patched/modded apks are unaffected because the check is patched out

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Yes but not as blatant as STINKY

Everyone with a smartphone would see STINKY and immediately get suspicious, while only techs would have noticed the hidden network and investigated on that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Pork sausage (wurst?) is way more tasty

I'd rather skip a meal if the only option was spam

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They taste better

Spam is one of the grossest food i ever tried

 
 

For some reason my iPhone is called "iPhone (2)" and that bothers me to no end. But i can't find the way to rename it, the name can't be clicked and no textbox appears.

This phone was given to me by my employer. Do they have the power to restrict this?

view more: next ›