sceptical
susceptible*
So it's a foregone conclusion that resistance or even discussion is futile?
Besides fox News and the like, who said that?
What am I missing here? Two sentences telling us his claims isn't the complete failure of journalism y'all seem to be insinuating it is...
That is absolutely horrifying
Sounds like a perfectly great idea /s
"Nah guys, we're good on money, thanks. Got enough."
Well shit color me Trupid -- I missed one of the braindead anti-ideas
I might know which user said that to you. I had a run in like that too. They kept telling how I was objectively a fascist for agreeing with the sentiment -- was explicitly explaining that I am not sure how you would implement it precisely, but that it was understandable. NO ITS fAsCisT and UnCoNsTitUtIoNaL!!!
This honestly makes so much more sense than anything else. I think you nailed it. Republicans are motivated by money and exerting social control so they write up manifestos (p2025), take over the courts, work hard to disenfranchise voters, lie, cheat, anything is on the table. The DNC does indeed seem fairly comfortable with losing by comparison, despite the fact that the leftist ideals they supposedly dabble in create a moral imperative to never lose. I wonder if Republicans fucking pay the DNC money to run these candidates we all know aren't the best. They're just good enough to get votes against mother fucking Trump. But not always good enough to win, barely good enough when they are, typically.
It's downright sad that I can't think of any argument against this.
view more: next ›
Nope. Not what you're saying it is. They call out its origin even.
They also briefly mention what he claims. That is in no way corroborating it. They are simply trying to avoid seeming biased. The other time "2025" appears in that page, it's a quote from Harris about how dangerous it is.
This is normal and decent journalism.