Tinidril

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

There are certainly a lot of places where Democrats have fallen short but, in the big picture, Democrats are far less hostile to average Americans than the Republicans.

The worse the Republicans get, the more people want to see the Democrats as the "good guys". That has unfortunately not been validated by Democratic policy most of the time. They do try to cater to average Americans, but only in ways that are palatable to the donor class. Republicans offer nothing to average Americans and rely entirely on culture war nonsense for popular support.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Something like "Drumpf"?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

The most honest and useful measure is median net worth bracketed by age, and that's exactly what the article uses. It's not twisting anything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Exactly! The party running on saving democracy already stole our ability to democratically select a candidate. At least they should be willing to present the appearance of an approximation of democracy. Somehow that's suddenly a radical position.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Which part is the disinformation? I think "genocide Joe" is a bit over the top, but Biden has clearly not pushed back on the Palestinian genocide as hard as the left (reasonably) wants. As for Biden's age, I think that's been pretty well vindicated now.

I don't dispute that the right disingenuously jumps on leftist issues, but I also think we need to grapple with the fact that the Democratic establishment has continuously chosen to make the party vulnerable to such attacks. Democrats should suck less than they do, not just less than Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are states that require candidates to register by a date that is often before the nominating conventions. Those states have always passed one-time exceptions when that occurs. If they choose not to in this case, using the last minute change as political cover, it could be a legal grey area, and who knows how it would play out with today's judicial system.

On the other hand, those are red states that a Democrat wouldn't win anyways.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I was in IT back in 2001 when the Code Red virus hit. It was a very similar situation where entire enterprises in totally unrelated fields were brought down. So many infected machines were still trying to replicate that corporate networks and Internet backbone routers were getting absolutely crushed.

Prior to that, trying to get real funding for securing networks was almost impossible. Suddenly security was the hottest topic in IT and corporations were throwing money at all the snake oil Silicon Valley could produce.

That lasted for a couple years, then things started going back to business as usual. Microsoft in particular was making all sorts of promises and boasts about how they made security their top priority, but that never really happened. Security remained something slapped on at the end of product development and was never allowed to interfere with producing products demanded by marketing with inherently insecure designs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

She was never a federal prosecutor. She has never been accused of this kind of "behavior".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think you mean the mechanics of a teleprompter sitting there since, as I said, there is no evidence whatsoever that it was hit, and eyewitnesses saying it wasn't. Sure, it's possible. The bullet might also have struck a passing bird and it's beak flew into Trump's ear.

I get conspiracy theories that drive towards some desired political ends, but this random bullshit is just dumb. Somebody shot a bullet and as a result Trump has a bloody ear. Why should anyone even care if it hit directly or was a secondary impact? It changes nothing of any relevance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There is a photograph that happened to catch the bullet in mid-flight just short of hitting Trump. There has been no credible statements from anyone who would know saying it was from the teleprompter. There isn't even any reporting that the teleprompter was hit. It's just one of a dozen fabricated narratives. If you can't "sleuth" any better than this, you are going to be steamrolled by AI generated propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This is based on incorrect early speculation. A bullet nicked his ear directly. Not that it really matters.

view more: ‹ prev next ›