TheGrandNagus

That's what the lyrics say though.

On the X day of Christmas my true love gave to me, X [item], X-1 [item], etc.

The song explicitly states they give this stuff every day.

But it literally did nail it?

It's giving you a list of the items that were received in the 12 Days of Christmas. And it's correct.

12*1=12

11*2=22

10*3=30

And so on.

If you wanted the lyrics, that's a different question.

You equated them multiple times. You know you did.

Stop defending raping children you nonce.

Leclerc tanks? I didn't know Ferrari were that serious about the Constructors Championship...

It's been in all of your comments where you brought it up. You know you said it.

Yeah but... how?

I know you don't like the author (and I don't either, she's a twat), but it's pretty undeniable that literally tens or hundreds of millions of people enjoy Harry Potter.

Actually, 100% of what I said is true. Let's go through it together

Microsoft does not own systemd

True.

The closest thing to an "owner" the project has would be Red Hat (not owned by MS), but it's had over 2000 authors in its time.

And even if they did, and put copilot into it, distros could still choose to not use it

True.

This in fact happens already. Lots of distros that use systemd only use some components of it. It's GPL code, you can do that...

Now let's move on to Lennart Poettering.

Yeah, he was one of the top people behind systemd, and he has now moved to a job within Microsoft. What's your point? That doesn't mean systemd is Microsoft property now. That's not how it works lol. PulseAudio isn't either.

Tbh, I don't really see how? What about NATO prevents it?

And what about the countries of Europe that are in NATO (or have expressed a desire to join) but not the EU?

Fucking finally. My 7 will be thankful. Xperias have had this for years.

I don't know how I feel about this.

Which is worse, the government telling people that they can't wear certain clothes (and let's be real, at least some of the proponents of implementing this are doing it in an Islamophobic way), or allowing a practice that's clearly intended to cover women up and treat them as second class citizens within their Islamic culture?

Which is right? Which is wrong? I feel so conflicted about this.

I don't want the state dictating dress code, that's absolutely ludicrous, but I also don't want an oppressive sexist religion dictating that women need to cover up otherwise (ghasp!) a man might see their skin.

That's a different matter though. The above comment was about co-opting NATO if the US lost interest in it.

That doesn't go against the EU working towards forming a joint military.