Edit: it looks like there is a voice input only app they make that is separate, that is what I use. https://voiceinput.futo.org/
Did you mean "but"? Helioboard is a full-blown keyboard if I remember, and FUTO is offline voice LLM only, with multiple language support. I only speak English but it works great. It's not a keyboard that types, you just click it when you want to speak.
FUTO is the greatest use of on-device LLM so far. It never gets anything wrong, even my thought markers "..."
I assume the problem is hardware. Matt's hardware didn't work well with LM, therefore Matt thinks LM sucks.. I do wish there was better hardware support but it's the reason apple went with 1 product = 1 OS = 1 general set of hardware. Sure not every iPhone has the same hardware, but that's why they have the model numbers, and it's so much easier to test 200 model mixes than 2,000,000 (Android). Windows gets all the debug info sent directly to them like the others but they also have a huge stack of hardware they can use or they can buy it to test.
Just something to keep in mind for those not in the security space. When a security company does an audit, its generally a checklist of commercial and custom security software along with a couple people poking around looking for more manual harder to find stuff. But there's a reason companies like Mullvad have a bug bounty program.... Just because cure53 didn't find it, it doesn't mean some bored hacker won't..
Absolutely better than nothing though.
This should have been much more well thought out The wording, image, buttons, specific wording for each page.
They really screwed the pooch.
Another 4-6 months minimum before release. But quarterly numbers must be met.
Good stuff. Not thought about enough. GPS spoofing random routes also.
Do a lot of reading. Get a cyber informations systems basics overview on your own self-teaching before you try to understand it all.
Stay away from session and matrix. Signal, Nostr, SimpleX (nvm if you use Apple products) and the like are okay, but they are all hobbyist influencable products besides Signal which gets fat government grants and just happens to use the same encryption standards as all other huge name E2EE tools.
Stuff is fun to learn on, but get a good VPN (debates about.... mullvad, ivpn, cryptostorm seem okay). here's something fun for you and free: https://www.thc.org/segfault/
Then maybe you're okay.
A number of people can see your IP, people will chime in and add to ane remove from this list:
Some info may be wrong. But having someone's IP in the days of routers and all filtered ports means little, unless you piss off someone who knows some low level customer support person @ your ISP to pay to get your account info. Or you're dealing drugs in which case use TAILS and stop fucking with technologies you don't know the specifics of.
If they knock you offline and you can't access anything at all, unplug your router AND MODEM (most importantly your modem) for an hour. Go touch grass for an hour. Widdle a wee branch. Plus your boxes back in and you'll be bright as new.
@[email protected] this isn't meant to be a dig at you, although last time you didn't care to correct or learn if I recall,but often times you leave out the "if so," "possibly, what and XYZ?'" and it ends up spreading misinformation because you didn't know enough or care enough to type enough.
I love Matrix but we need to be open about what the fish is before skinning it..
https://gist.github.com/maxidorius/5736fd09c9194b7a6dc03b6b8d7220d0
https://blog.erethon.com/blog/2022/07/13/what-a-malicious-matrix-homeserver-admin-can-do/
https://www.reddit.com/r/PrivacyGuides/comments/q7qsty/is_matrix_still_a_metadata_disaster/
Just to confirm the obvious. Downvotes are expected but OP you should read this.
They are close enough to see that they are quad copters, and they make a buzzing noise, correct?
There have been a lot of UAP flaps where the objects (not quad copter looking) will fly low over the countryside, just above the tree-lines to much higher. They usually make no noise aside from reports of static or screeching or electronic interference.
Unlikely to be the case but if so, report to your countries MUFON type department and get as much evidence (video with sound, drawings, time and date, etc) as you can.
There is something else out there, whether it's military black projects mapping areas or what have you, and it needs to be documented.
If it is for sure quad copter drones, you can get a device to blast the 2.4Ghz spectrum for a short time and make them 'phone home' and the operators will stop flying them over your property once they realize something wrong keeps happening when they do. Legality varies.
Many tutorials available to DIY. You can also buy them pre-built, just more expensive.
wget toteslegitdebian.app/installer.sh & chmod +x && ./installer.sh
was I not supposed to do that? but staxoverflown said it's OK.
That does go a long way towards explaining why there are so many Bluetooth vulnerabilities, thanks for the info. Looking at the list of Bluetooth protocols wiki page gives me a headache. Surely there is a better standard, and I see things like HaLow, ZigBee, Z-Wave and other custom protocols, but it seems like there should be a very cleanly well-documented alternative to do the basics that everyone expects BT to do. This, coming from a total noob, speaking completely out of my anus. I just know that as a BT user, it's a crapshoot whether there will be major audio delay, and pause/play actually worked, that's if pairing works in the first place. But if something did come along I wonder if there would even be adoption among consumer devices.
I don't know why but I've got this strange tingling feeling it might just be a human nature group thing.