SpezCanLigmaBalls

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You notice how you go completely outside the context of this situation?

Let's say Hillary was on trial and we had a situation like Trump's. If Republicans did this exact orchestration of complaints I guarantee you this sub would be screeching about obstructing justice and anything else related.

I feel like you're going to have a hard time sticking to the context of this situation and not go about what Republicans have already done which I know and understand but that doesn't mean we should be doing bullshit like this.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/03/politics/cannon-orchestrated-complaints-trump/index.html

It obviously did nothing good. It never was going to. What was the point of it? Why cheer it on? Why not just let Jack Smith corner her like he obviously is doing and not interfere?

Please tell me how this was actually a good thing vs just bad overall. It's extremely hypocritical for us to raise pitchforks toward the right about everything they do and then cheer something like this on. Sure, it's not as low as the right has gone but that does not give any reason for why this was the right thing to do over just letting Jack do what he's doing.

Now complaints can't even be sent in. Way to go Democrats. You blocked off all complaints for a judge about something we all know she's doing. So now if there is anything new to complain about, shit outta luck.

Like, cmon dude. You're allowed to be critical of your own political party. Just because Republicans have done what they have doesn't mean we should start doing shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Sure, but why not just be better than them in every single aspect we can be? How about we let Jack Smith do what he's obviously trying to do and not do bullshit like this.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/03/politics/cannon-orchestrated-complaints-trump/index.html

It obviously did nothing good. It only makes us look bad. There was no way this would ever go in our favor. You're using the excuse of they did bad stuff so we can stoop a bit also. How about not?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Congrats, look what You've done

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/03/politics/cannon-orchestrated-complaints-trump/index.html

You think this actually did anything good? Seriously? If there was a case against Democrats and Republicans did this exact same thing you guys would be spewing about how they're trying to stop justice and messing with the legal system. Nothing good was done by this.

And yes, you can actually be a Democrat but see outside the echo chamber of social media. How about you let Jack Smith do what he's trying to do and not allow this bullshit to be cheered on.

Now please tell me why I can't be a Democrat just because I decide to call something out that obviously will do no good for anyone? I would love to hear it. It's crazy how if you don't fit all the criteria on social media of the echo chamber you suddenly can't be what you claim. It's so hypocritical, especially for Democrats to say shit like that

Guess what? You're actually allowed to criticize your own political party believe it or not. The Democratic party isn't supposed to be a cult but when you aren't even allowed to criticize your own party it really starts to look like one doesn't it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Have y'all heard about Trump being the antichrist? I'm not religious but it's eery how closely it matches up. So many specifics that can't just be made up.

Here's a link if you're curious - https://www.benjaminlcorey.com/could-american-evangelicals-spot-the-antichrist-heres-the-biblical-predictions/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Musk fans punching the air

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

A certified bad time right there

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck you stranger

[–] [email protected] 112 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My mind changed escalator to elevator because it didn't want to believe this

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that's a dog

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

This is one of those comments where you can tell so much about who a person is

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Truly a big brain move by god

 

Is it possible we could get filters for community search? I would love to be able to filter by subscriber size

1
Mood (lemmy.world)
 
1
VPS to bypass CGNAT (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I have T-Mobile wifi (Really great btw for $30 with my plan) but it has the big dumb cgnat. I have a plex server and you can't stream remotely with it. I had an Oracle VPS but after my trial ran out they decided they wanted to delete it with no warning.

I was using a wireguard vpn connected to my vps with Plex ports to bypass it. Right now oracle is out of instances for me to use so I thought I could see if there are any better alternatives.

I am using this GitHub script to do it

https://github.com/mochman/Bypass_CGNAT/wiki

I am wondering if anybody knows of a good VPS that I could use. I don't necessarily mind paying for it but I would like it to be relatively cheap if not free.

If it matters at all I have a Raspberry Pi 4 with DietPi running my plex server.

I haven't tried this but would it be possible to set up my VPN using wireguard on my pi and have plex point towards that?

I had Mullvad but since they are getting rid of port forwarding I got TorGuard (blah blah USA company, I know). Also wondering if there are better VPNs that I could use for... Downloading... Stuff

The guide has digital ocean and AWS Lightrail also but im not sure which one would be best and less likely to delete my account. I would prefer to use a VPN that I already pay for but im just not all too sure on how to go about that

Edit: Ended up using rack nerd. Got their 4tb monthly vps for $14 a year. Perfect for me

view more: next ›