That argument works for like, Pringles, not something you generally are legally required to have. If they’re required to spend money on advertising just to remain competitive, that sounds like you could severely restrict all insurance company’s ability to spend on advertising and save everyone money.
Shiggles
It’s funny that, despite having zero idea what either of you are talking about, I knew you’d be a .ml account?
Microsoft: your computer, my choice
It’s not like the right is particularly unified on message, it just doesn’t bother them quite as much as long as their sports team is winning.
It will be hilarious to see republican men complaining about women staying abstinent as a direct result of their attacks on women’s rights.
I envy your optimism in choosing years instead of months.
They do not have a voice if you silence them personally to you. They hold no value.
They hold some value when their vote is why we’re having to even entertain this as a possibility.
If only it were possible to make points without inventing goofy and easily ridiculed scenarios.
There are well defined lines at which supporting the government would not be supporting a stable democracy. Project 2025 has enumerated several of them.
I would certainly love to not see a single one of them come up. I plan to be disappointed.
They all get to share the blame. What are you even trying to say? “Damn guys, I voted for hitler but it’s okay he won by more than a single vote so I didn’t even matter”
The main difference between a prime minister and a president is the fact that they’re appointed, not elected, no? Little difference when you consider the state of national primaries in the states, but still.
Most power generation is just steam spinning turbines. Solar’s just weird. Wind cuts out the steam loop.