Then perhaps they shouldn't have accepted it and striked as planned? The fact that it wasn't "enough" for the workers isn't on the POTUS and doesn't negate his actions.
SeedyOne
joined 1 year ago
Exactly what I did!
Their story may be embellished but the problem was legitimate at one point.
Used it last week on a trip to the PNW, still works. I didn't know the area code locally but asked the checkout guy, popped in Jenny's number as the rest and boom.
There are far better uses of your time than white-knighting perceived toxicity in such a tame thread. It's not even your thin skin or this supposed disagreement in what's toxic and what isn't that gets me.
It's your blatant hypocrisy in an "I'm taking my ball and going home" style statement only to write paragraph after paragraph of self-serving bullshit afterwards, calling a community out and THEN trying to justify your actions in post after post. If you'd just left and not gone edit/response wild, we'd be done long ago...but I think you just NEED to get the last word. We'll bud, it's all yours, we're moving on.
You asking others what their comment adds when you've been ranting and raving a day after you claimed you wouldn't participate here is telling.
As you condescendingly told the guy who didn't properly screenshot his /c/privacy issue last week, "You can do better in the future".
Today you learned that a biased result isn't necessarily an incorrect one. Sometimes in life, a spade really is a spade.
Seems the universe says otherwise.
Downvotes for a lame joke that missed the mark = toxic? I read all the responses, nothing toxic there... so what else could it be? Perhaps you aren't ready for the Internet.
Don't forget those "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" voting against their own interests.
view more: next ›
Appreciate the edits