Saint_La_Croix_Crosse

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar drastically outperformed Harris.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago

It is not the candidate's job to appeal to voters. The Democrats should just be owed votes from all non-MAGA, and they should never have to put forward any policies or effort for voters.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (15 children)

She seems to have lost worse than Hillary...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, at no point did the Centre try to form a coalition with the KPD, but were turned down. In the Weimar system, it is the Chancellor that is in charge of forming coalitions, so even if the KPD, SPD, and Centre had enough seats to form a majority (which they didn't), they couldn't just form a coalition. This is why Franz Von Papen was appointed by Hindenburg, since he was expected to be able to convince the Centre party and Nazis to form a coalition with the conservatives and monarchists. And why when that failed and there was a failure to form a ruling coalition that Hindenburg appointed Hitler as chancellor to create a Nazi lead coalition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

A vote for third party is a vote for Harris. You have to hold your nose and vote Trump!

But seriously, Libertarians are the largest third party by quite a margin. So third parties actually help Democrats. It is just the Democrats mentality that they are owed votes for not being Republicans, rather than a candidate's or party's job to try to appeal to voters that this narrative is pushed forward.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Particularly, there was huge overlap in membership between the Freikorps and the Stürmabteilung. So it is important to note that the Freikorps was a direct precursor to the Nazi brownshirts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

The only part that is wrong is that Nazis did not have an overall majority, it was because of Hindenburg, monarchists, conservatives, and right-wing liberals deciding to side with the Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, that still incorrect. First, KPD, SPD and Centre did not have an outright majority together. Second, it is the Chancellor that is in charge of forming coalitions, they can't just form a coalition if they had an outright majority anyway in the Weimar system and at no point did Centre try to form a coalition and was turned down by the KPD. The entire point of Hindenburg appointing Franz Von Papen was that he thought that he could convince both the Nazis and Centre to form a coalition with the conservative and monarchist parties. And the reason later to appoint Hitler as chancellor was to form a Nazi led coalition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Anyway, vote for Hindenburg.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

No, The Donald was encouraging political violence and was becoming a legal liability for Reddit to continue hosting. But they needed to ban a major left wing subreddit at the same time to do a "both sides bad" thing and preempt the fascist talking points about social media having a liberal bias.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Wait, like the drug dealer? but seriously, "they have moderation, so you don't have to read or engage with facts, since they have a viewpoint" isn't the dunk you think it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

though, to be fair, kulaks are bad.

view more: next ›