SARGE

"just doing my job" isn't really relevant when your job is literally destroying democracy to assist a fascist neo-nazi regime

Yes, quitting "in protest" is an option, but why do that when you can just collect a paycheck and be a shitty as possible at your job until you get fired?

"oh sure thing boss I'll get right on this deletion thing" 6 days of fucking around on the fediverse later, websites still unchanged "oh yeah I'm working on it, top priority!"

I get fear of retribution if they figure out you're doing it on purpose to sabotage efforts but like.... How many people are actually bothering?

I can't imagine someone in the firing squad trying to say "I was just doing my job", it's not the same thing as the guy working in the lunchroom. The only difference in my opinion is the firing squad kills people and the guy at the computer kills information, democracy, morality, common sense etc...

You can't say you were just doing your job when your job is "destroy this information"

Yes, it's "just a small part" but even the Great Wall of China is made of smaller bricks/slabs. The whole can't exist without the separate pieces.

I'm a little rambly, apologies. I hope I've made a coherent point.

Okay so I have a basic understanding of orbital mechanics, I would say astronomy and astrophysics is a hobby of mine, and my content subscription list is filled with space nerds talking about nerdy space stuff.

I do not understand how the rotation of the milky way could be making it seem as though other galaxies are rotating a specific direction.

I understand if you spin in place and are looking at something above you that's spinning in a certain way, it might appear to spin the opposite way it is relative to the floor, because you're spinning faster. However, my problem understanding stems from the fact that the milky way is huge and we are rotating around a very large axis, not at a rate that my common sense tells me would be noticeable.

Maybe I'm just not giving NASA and ESA enough credit for their measurement capabilities, but I don't get it.

And maybe I'm so far off base someone is face-palming into their screen in disappointment that I could choose be so wrong.

If anyone could explain, or post a link to a space nerd talking about nerdy space stuff thats relevant to the answer, please edumacate me!

I like star trek memes.

I have a ton of saved memes.

All my memes have been posted in all relevant communities multiple times.

I'll never call out reposts because there are always people who haven't seen something, but it feels weird posting stuff I know has been posted already. Especially when some are at the top rankings in the community.

But I'll keep up voting and commenting on funny memes because it's better than ~~staring into the void~~ not doing those things...

They're destroying your shit, you should be allowed to go destroy theirs.

Farm just down the road sells dozens for a dollar.

But I don't really care for eggs, so I'm not seething so much as chuckling at the egg prices in the store.

This morning I passed a dozen for $6.

Beware that Nvidia cards have driver issues, they’re fixable but if you do have an Nvidia card, I’d just use the built in graphics chip for trying out Linux at first.

Well, shit. Extra work for me. I knew I should have waited for the AMD series to be in stock...

I know just enough about Linux to know I should have been getting into it when I graduated over a decade ago.

I also know just enough to know it can do pretty much everything I need, as long as I'm willing to switch to a Linux alternative with similar capabilities.

However, I am Linux-dumb and deeply set into my windows, to the point where I'm not sure I have the technical savvy to switch.

From my understanding, Linux works very well, as long as you know what you're doing.

I'm sure I'm overestimating the learning curve but it's still intimidating.

I saw the headline, my brain went "so he's being held in contempt, as would any other person refusing to answer a question, right?"

Of course, I already knew the answer.

Okay so even though I read all this last night, I somehow missed the "2000 - (-2000) years" thus making the current geological age around 4000 years, and technically Pompeii would not count in the strictest definition. That said, had it happened 4,000 years ago, absolutely nothing would have changed. All the stuff would still be carbonized.

~~Also from Wikipedia in the (geological age) article: An age is the smallest hierarchical geochronologic unit. It is equivalent to a chronostratigraphic stage.[14][13] There are 96 formal and five informal ages.[2] The current age is the Meghalayan.~~

~~So again the answer is "yes it counts" but my personal take is "it feels weird to consider 4,000-10,000 ago multiple different geologic ages"~~

People in these comments act like the computer will just stop working.

If you mean the cheap white/green plastic injection molded chairs? I've never had one break on me. That's an insult to the chair.

If you mean the shitty things sporting goods stores keep in their giant bins as soon as you walk in the door during spring? Yeah that tracks. Although I've had some that require fancy slides and buttons to collapse, thus making them harder to fold than this wet lump of shit.

From wikipedia: A fossil (from Classical Latin fossilis, lit. 'obtained by digging')[1] is any preserved remains, impression, or trace of any once-living thing from a past geological age.

Answer: yes. It does count. Specifically carbonization.

Personal take: when I think of a "fossil", I think of the stereotypical mineralized bones. Like the T-Rex in the museum of natural history that most people have seen from various movies and TV shows. Thinking of human and human predecessor bones as fossils is just weird to me.