Resand

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

It's not so much that it's only the "I can't in good conscience vote for this party, so it's better that the objectively worse party wins" crowd is worse then "I want the fascist to win" crowd. It's the first crowd might listen, while the second is a lost cause.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The issue is, there's not many places in the world that won't be affected :(

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and 12% not sure aka couldn't really make up their mind if Hitler was bad or not... so ads up to 24%

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sure, but there's also half of your countrymen to think about

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly at this point, in a 1 on 1 war between south and north, I'd wager on South. Will still suck super bad tho

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It’s a gender election. It really is.

Is it tho? About 40% of GOP voters are women. Sure it's not 50%, but still much larger percentage than you'd think if it was a "war of the sexes" thing

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No no no, that's simply wrong.

US healthcare system is the best in the world, at doing what it's designed to do. Issue here is that they're measuring it on care provide vs cost, while the US system is optimized for profits.

If they instead ranked the results by which system generated the most private profits the US would be first.