PoisonedPrisonPanda

Its always something isnt it?

I too had issues with some stuff at first. But until I dive into org mode its the best i was getting.

(Im telling this from stumbling through many apps like tiddlywiki, obsidian, joplin, qownnotes, trilliumnotes, standardnotes, and probably more)

Ill hijack op now.

Can i setup cloudflare tunnel and stil access the server via Lan when I am at home with the same setup?

Like a two entry system?

Probably about the rate, its a free service and money matters.

Or logseq which is open source.

Or joplin. Or a meriad of other apps

Thats basically what I am doing, but with logseq, which is open source.

The principles are differing, where Logseq is an outliner.

But creating a template including e.g. #fishing with a bulletlist which can be checked and using this template in your journal you will have as backlinks in the fishing page the occurences of when you used this hashtag.

I was fucking around with my windows pc.

And then i found out that you can fuck more around in linux, and that was the story of my first ubuntu iso burned on a cd.

I had no clue about anything but was blown away by something "different"

Indeed. And I am more curious about whats possible instead of missing the good old days.

Nobody can argue that a 1950 movie is better as a marvel multi million production.

Even watching movies from the late 90s -2000s is a time travel and I assume most of the "good old movies" is of nostalgic origin

However nothing that cant be done by modern movies.

lifeless and boring

Do you have an example for that?

To me modern productions are putting so much effort in side story/side character building that it gets complex.

Also that nowadays a good movie lasts 3 hours. Instead of the good old 90 minutes.

As others said, depends on the definition.

I throw Tails into the ring.

Having a non-persistent system makes it safe in some way.

Hmm. I think the discussion turning around copyright and fair use is somehow the bedrock of this.

You are right. Since we cannot even find a solution to work for nowadays breaches of copyright, it will probably be still problematic in future cases as well.

But I also see the chance to get rid of something on the way.

As we know what does not work, like copyright law execution and the uphill battle of forcing it, we can truly think outside the box.

i do not want to take sides on certain technologies for now as I never truly looked into such special case, but I could think of some kind of ownership verificatiom mechanism probably backed by cryptocurrency even nfts.

I do not expect for people to pay in full compensation for skills (capitalism shows us on youtube how some ecosystem is formed) but I am confident that the market will nonetheless finds some solution. We will get more of everything, this means trash, and this means copythefted content as well but summing up the content will be better, and skill will find a way to sustain and be unique on its own.

Anyway I am drifting off. I see many similarities in piracy discussions here in certain comminities. Because if it can be done, it will be done, and I see no choice but making the best out of it during the way.

Reputation is an interesting point.

But as I said in another post. That is no issue of AI itself.

We need anyway a verification of validity for anything in the near future.

Therefore it is already late for thinking about that. In the modern world nothing is valid until proven to be.

Sure. I fully agree with you.

But nonetheless its how technology works. Make something accessible to everyone (at least in digital technology)

Lets compare it to how davinci would have though about the possibility of photocopying the mona lisa and bring the art into every household.

Making him more fameous more than he could ever be by simply having one original picture in the louvre.

I think this example can be done with any abritrary skill and digital modelling.

Lets think ahead. A tennis player and his movements are used to train and create a robot which acts as a tennis teacher for tennis amateurs. It would also benefit the sport in general.

I dont see how its a bad thing. Its basically multiplicating the amount of better narrators in that example.

Why having a shitty narrating voice when you can have an awarded one?

The only thing is the compensation to the originator and the labelling of whats real and generated.

But thats a minor issue IMO.