PandaBearGreen

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

A sovereign nation who's leadership drank the NATO kool-aid against the protest of their nuclear armed neighbor, goading them into a fight. The victims are the people of both nations.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I actually have a position.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No one is justifying the acts of Russia. They should not have invaded! But to act like there is no pretext to conflict and Ukraine is completely innocent is disingenuous. Peace is the better option.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's like you have an opinion and don't all at the same time. Maybe reconsider your position.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Russia has definitely not engaged in total war.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

1989 Revolutions? Wholesale dismemberment of the USSR more like. And treaty didn't say it. The Russians sure as fuck did.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

The contradiction is saying that allowing a country to defend/enforce its borders is appeasement. The implications is that to do so is aggression.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seem contradictory to use charged language like 'appeasement '. And then to say you want everyone to coexist peacefully. It seems to advocate for containment which isn't peaceful coexistence.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Says person calling people assholes.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You said appeasement.

view more: next ›