OwlPaste

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Problem is that they still have thousands in storage, even if they are in bad condition, a tank is a tank, it still has its place in war. They still have ifvs and they still have artillery and the biggest indicator is that they are still capturing territory regardless of huge losses.

At the rate of 10-20 tanks a day, you are still looking at 300-150 days before they start running out of stored ones, not counting that they are manufacturing some amount monthly. But battle lines don't lie. They are still moving in the wrong direction. I don't like it and wish Ukraine could retake those territories but russians are far from wasted no matter how much we all wish that they were.

Its a very bad mistake to underestimate your opponent and assume that some magic wonder weapon will suddenly tip the scale of war. The only thing that will do this is increased supply of western arms and removal of the absolutely insane rules of not attacking russian territory.

F16 by themselves will not be enough, but they will help of course. Hopefully to lower the damage to infrastructure and hopefully to damage russian air force.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Just keep in mind that russians get ~1mil conscripts a year. They can keep feeding their mince machine for a long time to come. Besides massively more support with heavy weapons without restrictions, I am not entirely sure Ukraine can outlast old ussr stockpiles...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Exactly but since it worked, i am not complaining 😅

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Been gaming on linux for the better part of last couple of decades, can agree its in a muhc better place now and its a rarety to find a title that doesn't work through proton. There are some but not a massive amount.

Kinda ironic but out of the ones that don't work for proton, sometimes they work via wine instead

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

A mission to land on the sun you say?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exactly as foretold by anyone with a single working braincell... (Or at least understanding of how computer security works)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats why i said, they are amazing value for money. But sould be interesting to know just how many boats it takes to take out 60 or so ships

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You missed the point (and i should have perhaps been clearer), the chap was saying "no navy", i am pointing out that suicide drones are still part of that navy and Ukrainians had 15000 personal at the start of the war in the navy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (7 children)

You really gotta count how many cheap boat Ukrainians lost trying to sink 60 ships. Ofc they (suicide boats) are much, much, much cheaper and cause no crew casualties being remotely controlled. So it is super cost effective, And most importantly safe, but if you count pure numbers i am sure Ukrainian losses of those boats are massively higher.

But the fact that russians can still use their missles ships to launch missiles is a big issue. Even if there are fewer of those ships, its not 0 :(... Yet

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those right hand fingers are making me think of salad fingers...

view more: ‹ prev next ›