OurToothbrush

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most people don't understand calculus either, doesn't mean it isnt necessary for certain applications.

And marxist analysis is generally more useful to the average person.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (36 children)

No, most landlords just buy housing. Construction is usually a seperate business.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

I'm not casting blame, I am talking structurally. As a class they do this behavior. Small landlords also contribute to the commodification of housing.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On the subject of Marxism, if people stopped getting into debt a lot less money would be flowing to the top. Banks would have fewer profits and their power would shrink.

See, this is an example of getting so close and missing analysis that you could have just read.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (38 children)

This part:

They made it possible that there was a house to rent.

Obviously.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Well, because as a class they raise the cost of land, meaning that many peoples only option is to rent. And then you have to pay off their mortgage for them.

Note that in the USSR apartments were 5 percent of income. That is what the actual cost of maintaining homes for people is, when you remove all the rent seeking and property speculation.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, successful land reform movements have historically been lead by angry communists, thank you for pointing that out for anyone who might be interested in a little land reform that their best bet is to look into communist strategies of land reform.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm not trying to be passive aggressive, I am trying to be earnest:

Youre wasting your abilities by not educating yourself on marxist analysis. You come close to a bunch of points that are made by marxists but don't have the base of knowledge to develop them properly and do further analysis on them. Modern Marxists actually do write on the debt economy and you have the very start of their analysis but you veer off.

This is not an attempt to call you stupid, this is pointing out that you're trying to do something and having the right tool for the job would make your life easier.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is actually, being a landlord is more of a feudal relationship within the framework of capitalism.

Now, both lords and capitalists should be

talked to about their destructive behavior and have their private property repatriated by the working class through legitimate state mechanisms, but there is a difference.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (40 children)

Landlords do not build houses, they own houses. Saying that they provide housing is equivalent to saying Jeff Bezos delivered your latest Amazon package.

Owning things is not creating things.

view more: ‹ prev next ›