Really, you've never detected slant from Reuters or AP?
I agree that cnn, fox, etc are outlets and not agencies but calling the agencies unbiased is also wrong.
Lolol. No.
Not referring to when soldiers of our genocidal government is attacked as "an attack on us" is literally just not being a nationalist.
Because of the bloodthirstiness. You can conceptualize that actual people would die right? At much larger scales?
You're in the US government?
This is just idealist bs
Why else would you speak of the US state as if you were a part of it, with "we" and "us"?
Because it is not necessarily great to subsume your identity to an empire
Yes, because what the US needs right now is another hot war, it is wise to encourage escalation into a direct conflict with Iran.
You do understand that will just make the US empire crumble faster, right?
Ah. As a citizen of the US I dont use "we" and "us" when referring to the US state.
Who is "we" and "us" here
Can you cite it being fake news?
Literally everyone has a bias. That is all I'm saying. People like to pretend that some groups keep things "objective" but that's not really possible or desirable, what is possible is being biased but staying factual.