Follow-up question - each portafilter is two shots right? So if you end up adding an third shot to a coffee, what do you do with the leftover fourth one?
(Or do you have a smaller, single shot portafilter?)
Follow-up question - each portafilter is two shots right? So if you end up adding an third shot to a coffee, what do you do with the leftover fourth one?
(Or do you have a smaller, single shot portafilter?)
Glad you enjoyed it! It was a really interesting heist type novel with some great world building. Cool how it basically started its own 'cyberpunk' genre.
I've read Project Hail Mary - that was great fun, and went to interesting places I wasn't expecting.
11/22/63 is one I've been wanting to read. Will definitely do so at some point next year!
What did you think of Neuromancer? I finished that not too long ago.
Wow that's a lot! Do you have any particular favourites of the ones you read?
LOOOK AЃ ͱANDS
Picking out parts of reviews that you find relevant is a good idea; your enjoyment of any kind of media is subjective and therefore unique to every person. I guess if you can find a particular reviewer with similar tastes, who also happens to have read a lot of the books you're interested in, their reviews could be a good indicator of whether you'll enjoy a book. And yes a 4 tends to be my baseline for book reviews; anything less and I didn't enjoy it that much. 5 is pretty much perfect.
Over-analysis is definitely an issue. It's inappropriate a lot of the time like you say. Writing a good review is tricky! You have to take into account the target audience, when it was written, whether it's part of a larger series and so on. Authors and readers are too often obsessed with their overall rating for a book, but the real indicator is what people have actually written in genuine reviews, and whether you agree with that opinion. Unfortunately websites like Goodreads don't make those reviews easy to find.
Great points. Does Steam get around this slightly by having different tags intended for meme reviews? I.e. I think I've seen '10 people said this review made them laugh' or something along those lines. That at least makes it a bit easier to filter out the 'actual' reviews. I wonder if the cumulative total (on both Steam and Goodreads) averages out the joke/genuine reviews, assuming that a) enough people have left a review and b) there hasn't been any review bombing.
And yeah there are plenty of books, games and shows out there that I've absolutely loved but they've been reviewed terribly by professional reviewers. I think on the whole people assign too much weight to arbitrary totals - "Oh this book is a 6/10 so I shouldn't waste my time on it". But if you think like this, you'll miss out on so much.
Well I hope you're able to slow down the pace a bit (assuming that's what you want)!
Ah thanks for clarifying. Would you not say that reading it slower would be the more enjoyable method? If you're after escapism, wouldn't it be better to engage yourself fully in the plot? At least for me, I find escapism works best when I'm fully immersed in the story's world and characters. What you've described sounds more akin to someone skimming a research paper.
Storygraph is quite a good alternative from my experience
There is definitely an element of that from the article and I agree it's ridiculous. Some authors and their followers attack those who give poor reviews (because they can't accept criticism, instead arguing that a 'professional' review would give them a much better score) and on the other side you have people reviewing books that aren't even out. In many cases it's no longer a place to find genuine reviews, but an unmoderated wild west with crap at both extremes (a bit like Twitter in that respect). It's a shame because there are plenty of people leaving great reviews, but it's becoming much harder to find them.
That's interesting to know, thanks! Most coffee shops where I live would probably never get busy enough to use a spare shot. Perhaps they change out to a single shot portafilter, but I've never noticed.