OfficerBribe

Tried compatibility mode already?

Too late, I am now a proud owner of Citroën

I filtered in IMDb movies where I have voted 7+ while user rating is up to 6 and these jumped out seemingly panned by both critics and users.

1. Gods of Egypt. Visually great, standard action story, don't get the dislike at all.
2. Tremors 4: The Legend Begins. I have watched most Tremors movies, have given them 6+. The one I disliked most was Tremors: Shrieker Island which I have rated 3.
3. Iron Sky. Do not remember a single thing, but it looks fun. Probably will rematch soon.

Absolute trash for me as well. I watched it alone when I was slightly drunk, thinking oh boy, let's put on something scary. Absolutely nothing happened. Few movies have left me angry. Insane it has such good critic score.

Blair Witch′s whole shtick of being the first (at least well known) found footage film is interesting from historical perspective, but that's about it. Much better than Paranormal Activity though.

Don't remember much of it besides the tattoo scene, but I recall it being alright for this type of movie. Weaker version of Dumb and Dumber maybe?

I remember Sucker Punch being visually pretty, it was the story and overall vibe that was awful.

Valerian was pretty cool, I have given it 7 in imdb. Seems like it globally has mediocre rating. For comparison I have given 3 for Sucker Punch.

It would collapse on itself due to paradox

Never realized there are so many rules for divisibility. This post fits in this category:

Forming an alternating sum of blocks of three from right to left gives a multiple of 7

299,999 would be 999 - 299 = 700 which is divisible by 7. And if we simply swap grouped digits to 999,299, it is also divisible by 7 since 299 - 999 = -700.

And as for 13:

Form the alternating sum of blocks of three from right to left. The result must be divisible by 13

So we have 999 - 999 + 299 = 299.

You can continue with other rules so we can then take this

Add 4 times the last digit to the rest. The result must be divisible by 13.

So for 299 it's 29 + 9 * 4 = 65 which divides by 13. Pretty cool.

Link, starts at 23 seconds.

Check out WhoSampled. It's the largest resource regarding samples/covers.

Thanks for clarification and great that this is not included in project, but couldn't someone change the server side code and somehow see more info that goes through?

I know there is that HTML check in https://searx.space/ to see if search interface code is not heavily modified, but on server side anything could go on.

If requests are encrypted in a way that searxng does not see contents then it probably is not trivial to do, but there always is a possibility something clever could be done.