Occamsrazer

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That would apply to any minority opinion as well, like supporting Palestine today, or being opposed to Japanese internment camps during world war 2 or opposing the Iraq war. Or being opposed to COVID vaccine mandates or school closures. People get cancelled for this stuff all the time, and being able to speak freely is critical to derailing social movements that go too far, which they always do. Anonymity is a double edged sword, where it holds people accountable for hate speech, but also provides security to express opinions that are contrary to prevailing narratives, things that desperately need to be said.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too many people in the world crave an identity that is original enough to be interesting, but not so original that it can't be quantified or defined by accepted or understood identity templates. They need to be able to put a name to their identity so they can talk about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Well you got my entire backstory created. I'd ask you to roll me for stats now, but I don't think you are playing with a full set of dice.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't believe you spent that much energy creating an identity for me in your head.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Jews are native to that area and it's not a race thing. If we can't agree on those two facts then we have no basis for discussion.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

But is that any worse than defaulting to the side with less power? At the end of the day if you have to side with one or the other, whoever happens to have power at the time seems like pretty arbitrary criteria. If instead Israel were the lesser power being bullied by a powerful Palestine, would you side with Israel? How about if Nazi Germany were getting bullied by Western powers, would you side with them? It wouldn't make sense because Nazis are very obviously the bad guys. Anyway it's not just about power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I hate smoking stock photos. Clearly she has never smoked in her life.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

The main problem with this book is in how it is applied by various people to Christianity in general (as opposed to a fringe cult), or used as an analogy of events today. It might apply in some cases, but those are so rare and unusual (back woods polygamist cults and the like), that they really don't deserve to be discussed in context of current politics.