Attach it to what? A carrier pidgeon?
LodeMike
joined 10 months ago
No it absolutely does fucking not include cartoons. (Edit: at least in the US)
And yes, even if it's of a real person/child. Apparently they're working on changing that.
Huh. Thanks.
Wait really?
Or at the very fucking least require specific versions with checksums, like golang.
~~I hate to ask this but those aren't the same person, right?~~
~~Edit: guy on the right's nose is way wider, so I'm gonna guess no.~~
trump stuns
Does he?
You say that like it's going to happen.
Autism or autism diagnoses?
Okay, dickhead. Do you treat everyone who talks about child abuse laws as a predator?
Let me tell you EXACTLY what will happen if the federal government treats cartoon pornofraphy the same as real CSAM: the amount of CSAM being viewed goes up. Way up.
The reason why real child sexual abuse is heavily penalized and cartoon stuff isn't is because real child sexual abuse is worse. Would you rather have people looking at cartoons or real children?
On top of that, shows like Euphoria,/and others would become just as illegal as real child pornography. After all, the characters depicted are minors, but the actors are adults. Would you be okay with someone watching Euphoria being punished the same as somene looking at real child sexual abuse?
"Oh but I would rather people not veiw anything of sexualized children, real or not-" well I hate to break it to you: its going to happen anyway. The point of criminal punishment is harm reduction. And punishing looking at a cartoon and child pornography the same is only going to increase viewership of real child pornography.
And I'm not even defending it [cartoons] but I definitely would like for real child sexual abuse to decrease, so I'm okay with (edit: CARTOONS) existing. YOU are reading into my comment.