LillyPip

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Especially when her main message is saving democracy

This is exactly the reason. Because saving democracy right now means getting every possible vote, and the Cheneys can sway some old, Reagan/Bush republicans who reflexively vote R without really paying attention. If even the Cheneys support Harris, they might take notice. It’s an enemy-of-my-enemy situation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think I understand why you’re not getting this. You simply can’t understand that under FPTP, the only way to vehemently deny one candidate and to keep them out of office is to ‘support’ the other, even if you don’t agree with them. When one candidate will destroy democracy and usher in an autocracy, if you actually care about having a choice in the future, the only effective solution is to support an opposition that will not destroy everything.

You still haven't addressed how Biden's foreign policy and Harris's presumed foreign policy (due to her unwillingness to create daylight) isn't a part of her platform aligned with the Cheneys.

This is not the topic of conversation, and I’ve already given you enough of my time. Google exists., and I’m not your polisci professor. You can look the rest up for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

the mythical centrist Dick Cheney voter.

You mean the Reagan/Bush era republicans who are now the most reliable voting block, and who feel like the current Republican party has gone too far, but have been dutifully ticking that R every election since they were able to vote? The ones on a steady diet of Fox News who think trump can’t really be that bad, but if the Cheney’s of all people, those dyed in the wool conservatives, are supporting Harris, maybe they should at least look a bit closer at it – those people who don’t exist?

I assure you, those people exist. Especially in swing states. They exist so much, professional pollsters warn they might be over represented.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks! I updated my comment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Did it work? https://xcancel.com/realDonaldTrump/status/347191326112112640?lang=en

It’s loading weird for me, maybe because I’m on mobile?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

No, it isn’t. The Cheneys aren’t supporting Harris, but rejecting trump and trying to pull more moderate conservatives away from him. Not towards Harris – their platforms are not aligned at all – but to try to bring the GOP away from self-immolation.

Again,their motives are purely self-interest.

On the other hand, Duke is saying he supports Stein because her interests align with his. Huge ass difference.

e: formatting

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You’re right, I misremembered an article I read last month:

# 200 aides of former Republicans, including both Bush presidents, endorse Kamala Harris

Bush’s lack of endorsement makes him somehow worse than he already was, in light of practically everyone else coming out against trump, and the bar is so low, Satan is tripping over it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (7 children)

This isn’t about like or dislike. Again, it’s about her track record. If Duke had come out to support Cornel West, we’d have collectively shrugged. I’d still strongly recommend nobody vote for him because he’s a spoiler, too, and I don’t like him as a candidate, but a Nazi endorsement for him would not make any difference.

The entire reason Duke supporting Stein matters is because of her history supporting fascists. How is this difficult to grasp?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It seems I can only search by username and I’m not sifting through all his posts to find it. Thanks, though!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Are they? Has fainting happened at other venues?

Why would they do that intentionally?

I’m not trying to be combative, but my sceptic spidey sense is tingling. This feels a bit conspiratorial.

e: I can get behind the water thing, but my gut leans towards his followers being hysterical fanatics.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (10 children)

There’s a very clear difference: Stein is a well-documented, intentional spoiler who’s funding comes primarily from Republican mega-donors and Russian interests, and who recently said out loud her purpose isn’t to advance her party but exclusively to block Harris.

Her track record makes that endorsement poignant.

If she was sincere and didn’t already align with fascist interests, we wouldn’t care what Nazis say about her.

view more: ‹ prev next ›