LethalSmack

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

While that’s a fair point, it’s not the only example of planning ahead. I’m sure there’s plenty of other ways than the ones I came up with in a few seconds.

They could also pick a drive throughs that have enough room to leave the line. Less common in cities but they’re still there.

Edit: I’d also like to point out that their lights and sirens are designed specifically to get people’s attention and get them moved out of the way. More difficult if you’re trying to get a vehicle 10 cars up to move but it’s not like they’re stuck waiting like the rest of us would be.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Non emergency needs are not an excuse for illegal behavior.

If it’s that critical that they remain close to their vehicle then they should plan better. I.e. a drive through, coffee shop with parking, thermos full of coffee, have two officers per vehicle and one stays with the car, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That’s fair. Maybe more reasonable than it first appeared.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oof, 15 to 30 years seems a bit much.

Davis’s family asserts Kruger and Davis were in a years-long relationship involving sex and drugs that started when Davis was 15 years old, and Kruger was an adult.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You’ve claimed several points that conflict and when asked directly what your point is you talk around it.

My point was Bernie got cheated out of that primary election

Your point was that the primary was above board and there was no reason to question it

Then you later agreed that there was good reason to question it

And now your point is that your point is clear?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Eh, fair enough. Undermined, cheated, manipulated, schemed, swindled, deceived, duped, defrauded, etc might have been a better description.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Your initial statement was clear but your subsequent comments across threads have not been.

It went from the primary was clear and upstanding, to there’s good reason to doubt the results, to it having no real effect other than some nasty words spoken, to it costing Hilary the election.

Which one is your actual point?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

So you’re saying the DNC’s actions undermining the primary election had real consequences? Or are those consequences not concrete enough?

Or are you saying we should accept their schemes, offer no consequences or criticism and just blindly follow?

Cause I certainly agree that we likely wouldn’t be in the current situation if the DNC had been above board and true to their role.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And that there is good reason to believe it was stolen from him

Have you read your other replies? Thats not the understanding I got from them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Projection at its finest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Convenient you skip over the undermine his campaign portion of my previous comment. But the fact that the Chair of the DNC resigned over it shows it was more than just saying "nasty things about him in private".

It should also be noted that their actions "caused significant harm to the Clinton campaign, and have been cited as a potential contributing factor to her loss in the general election". It is not as inconsequential as you present it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

The DNC heavily undermined and consistently sabotaged Bernie's campaign the point that the DNC chair stepped down and the DNC then apologized "for the inexcusable remarks made over email" that did not reflect the DNC's "steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process." (From the wikipedia link below).

From the 2016 Democratic National Committee email leak: In the emails, DNC staffers derided the Sanders campaign. The Washington Post reported: "Many of the most damaging emails suggest the committee was actively trying to undermine Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign."

Bernie was absolutely robbed of a fair primary election.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Committee_email_leak

view more: next ›