Lenins_Cat_Reincarnated

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I was referring to the last time we had a discussion on hexbear about a possible refederation with blahaj which was a few months ago. The drama around the defederation wasn’t really relevant for that discussion as it was a long time ago. Blahaj’s admin is open to federation with hexbear because we have a huge trans community and it would be nice to connect them with the community in blahaj, but due to the issues I mentioned it’s not really in the best interest of our trans community to federate.

Chasers are people who fetishise trans people. Trans spaces often attract people who won’t stop talking about our body parts which gets very uncomfortable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hexbear has very tight moderation to make sure it’s a comfortable place for minorities and people who don’t like interacting with racism, misogyny, transphobia etc. I browse blahaj.zone occasionally and its moderation is just not good. The trans communities attract chasers which makes me not want to post there, and in 196 I regularly come across posts that are misogynistic or transphobic and have been up for days. I always report them and they often (not always) get deleted after like a day, which in my opinion is too late because the harm has been done (a 2 day old post should have been removed whenever a mod came across it).

On hexbear I’ve not seen posts that were so blatantly misogynistic or transphobic, and posts get removed much faster. This is why many trans people in our community don’t want to federate with blahaj.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

It just means phone is in sleep mode so you don’t get notifications.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

You can divide the debate into several topics and let the candidates choose for which topics they’d like to be included in the debate. Something like 5 candidates per topic is a bit more doable but obviously it would still not be as easy to follow as a debate between 2 candidates.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah I get that, but I don’t think anyone can realistically expect military pagers would not be used by civilians. This whole attack imo is indiscriminate by definition because Israel had really no way of confirming where the pagers actually ended up and thus took a huge ‘risk’ by letting them explode without that knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s a terror attack. If they didn’t want civilian casualties they wouldn’t have taken this outrageous route.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Depends on if the integral is integrated in the text or if it gets its own area

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Yes. I have a personality disorder that makes me want everyone to like me so I’m always nice (sometimes to the point of being flirtatious) to strangers and people that haven’t offended me greatly. Obviously it doesn’t work on everyone.