JonEFive

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Android is probably my biggest privacy hole right now. I've considered alternatives but none of them particularly appeal to me. I moved away from Gmail, Google Voice, Chrome/chromium, deleted Facebook, etc... But android has some deep tendrils.

What's your take on Graphene?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They also don't want to be sued, so yes, this is the lowest effort way to limit their liability.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, is it just rights to use or ownership rights? Not saying the former is good, but it's still better than the latter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In many cases, its a CYA policy just so they don't have to ask permission for every single image. Hopefully they're the respectful type that will either remove or blur the student upon request.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It was either that or let Musk get away with stock market manipulation. Hard to tell which is worse at this point but I personally think him losing billions of dollars of investor money will hopefully cause then to think twice about giving him money in the future. That is, if Trump loses in 2024.

I have a growing suspicion that the goal was to intentionally delegitimize Twitter to the extent that one of the major social networks becomes an unmitigated misinformation factory - moreso than it was before. That seems like something billionaire investors might be willing to dump some serious cash into.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's been apparent since about a month or two after the sale was final. One of the very first things he did was invite Trump back

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's weird to me that a company of this size is just that inept. It's like once they have enough momentum, nothing can stop them.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't get why they don't get it. Huge numbers of people simply can't afford to invest $400 - $1000 on VR hardware. Those that can have not been adequately convinced of the value and a glorified chat room is never gonna cut it.

And then there are people like me who might have considered an Occulus before Facebook bought them, but I will never use another Facebook product as they are one of the easiest morally-bankrupt mega-corporations to boycott. None of the other vendors have a compelling product for me.

So even me, a tech leader who always hops on the cool new tech toys (I mean, I am posting on Lemmy right now after all) isn't all that interested. Which means I'm not talking it up to people I know. Now ask my friends about my opinion of the Steam Deck and whether it influenced them to buy one. This is Business 101 stuff that the multi-billion dollar company can't seem to figure out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sort of does. "Our vendor signed legally binding documents that they were responsible for vetting and verifying all parts. Sue them, not us."

Unless by risk you mean an airplane falling out of the sky...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Alpha move. Asserting dominance even from the grave.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Imagine if this article was written just because the author was having trouble downloading it because there weren't enough seeders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The OnlyFanimatrix?

view more: ‹ prev next ›