Hereforpron2

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Very helpful, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ahh that's interesting, so the issue is as much having a conveniently shifting position as it is a further-right-than-progressives static position. Thanks a ton, that helps me understand a lot!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Gotcha, so it means fake leftists almost? Does it imply someone is even further right than a current "centrist"? Or more like, "the center is right wing at this point, and so much so that even the Dems who are just left of center are still on the right [but therefore less than centrists still]"? This is not meant to be obstinate, your response was just very helpful and I want to bracket in on where folks consider liberals to be on the political spectrum so I can understand/use it properly.

 

For the longest time, "liberal" seemed like it basically just meant "Democrat" the same way "conservative" has/had been used to mean "Republican." Now, it seems like it means "bad Democrat" and is even worse than being MAGA the way many seem to use it. Where did its use as an insult within the [relative] political left come from, and what does it specifically accuse/identify someone of/as?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We've all snuck something home from the office here and there

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Communism (or Marxism more specifically)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Totally. Every next safety measure from airbags to seatbelts are about adding extra inches, rarely even full feet, and they are shockingly effective.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Largely true, but it's crazy what the difference of just a few feet of slowing down does (rather than zero feet of abrupt stopping) to acceleration forces. The crumple zone on a car only has to be 3 feet long to turn a 60mph crash from a fatality to a horrific injury.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

That goose is so fly they call his feathers "up" instead of "down"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Semenal album more like it

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Good to know, thank you! Yet more reasons to avoid it

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I think the point is that to you, it's just semantics. But, to use your example, given that some people have started intentionally using "female" in place of "woman" as an (arguably) subtle way to exclude trans women, it suddenly becomes more than semantics to both trans and anti-trans populations. That's what Smotherlove is saying about "dog whistle" language only being transparent to the perpetrator and the victim.

So from your/my perspective (admittedly assuming you're neither trans nor anti-trans), it's largely a case of "a few rotten apples ruining it for the rest of the bunch." What should just be a semantic difference has been coopted and intentionally weaponized by some, so all of us have to be conscious of whether or not we're making that worse.

It's also not a new phenomenon. Many epithets start as PC terms and then become offensive based on how a specific group starts to use them, notably, almost every one-time PC terms for Black Americans and people of color. Unfortunately, it's basically the reason that, for at least 100 years, (responsible) individuals/media have had to change terms for many marginalized peoples every 10-20 years, with many other examples, like "Oriental" and the terms that predate it, and plenty of others.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is this from? It's great

view more: next ›