https://lemm.ee/comment/3033256
I had the same dire thought, but this comment really made me take a breath.
GivingEuropeASpook
joined 1 year ago
I just think that people should be given access to comprehensive sex ed early enough in life that it's before they end up viewing something like pornography through their own actions.
Pretty sure that's already the case in South Korea, having to use your real identity online in certain cases. We can't let it expand worldwide.
Exactly, they don't view children as people, they view them as objects and extensions of their parents/guardians.
What nooo you're supposed to hate trans people enough to sacrifice personal freedoms and liberty!
Bourgeois governments gonna bourgeois
Also, it's never ACTUALLY about parental rights and protecting children. Plenty of parents want their kids to grow up believing that there is nothing inherently sexual about a naked body, or about women, but their perspective and rights never seem to be considered.
Think about how the reactionaries in control of many US states banned Drag Queen story hours and the like from libraries and schools, saying that it should be up to parents if they want their kids to go to them, only to then classify all drag shows as obscene and restricted to 18+.
An internet devoid of unacceptable "deviations" from gender and sexuality too. Given the effort to erase trans and gay people from public spaces, this seems like a parallel effort to destroy their digital ones too.
This is a comment section, not a peer-reviewed journal, sir
I do grasp writing, that is specifically why I asked this question, because the headline framing it as a loss is negative to people who aren't already supportive of climate action.
Why not "youth activists win climate change fight against montana?"
Literally doing Gods work with comments like these. Thanks for the context and insight.