It might, but that's not enough to say the Bible is okay with abortions, and the rest of the texts might contradict that interpretation anyway. The NIV is pretty unique in translating directly into miscarry. If I search for those passages in English right now on search engines, I'm not even guaranteed to end up on that version, it took me a few tries.
GhostMatter
The law can be broad with allowances to define specifics by decree, executive order or the equivalent.
Are you open to translations? Élisabeth Vonarburg is a great author, and her older books have been translated into English.
YouTube is still gonna recommend disgusting videos in "For You", even if you report them constantly.
KHTML was the basis of WebKit and then Blink/Chromium, so the community did make something. It was just overtaken by the corporate projects, for those same reasons you mention.
Recording my next fart would be a better use of energy than Bitcoin.
I think it's okay, I would have voted against it, but they really need to be careful with their website design.
The first time I went to their website, I left immediately because I got a big pop-up with 404. Tried again, same thing. Third time, I saw it was just a pop-up asking for then-optional registration.
Thankfully, they changed their pop-up design since then.
Even if it was truly was, humans are still faillible:
So even if the original text was given divinely, it would end up being distorted.
This is why I'm not comfortable saying the Bible is okay with abortion. It can be interpreted that way, for sure, but it's not a definite statement.