GarbageShootAlt2

I'm not going to waste my time with disingenuous hasbara scum like you. If anyone else sees these comments and wants me to way in, I will happily do it then, but anyone who is even familiar with Apartheid South Africa, much less Israel's sordid history, sees that your arguments are flimsy excuses and just as obfuscatory as the point I was originally responding to.

If you think that’s not true maybe you should get at least one Jewish friend and ask their opinion.

Fuck you, I have multiple Jewish friends and associates, and not a single one of them is a zionist shitbag like yourself. I did used to know some zionist Jews, and they were racist landlords. It's disgusting that you cover for genocide with their names.

I am begging, just begging, that, if you believe so strongly in your smol bean Apartheid, you go join the IDF and eat a rocket. The world will be better for it.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperate

I don't think they used it right (and they're a Spanish speaker, see the little tag?) but the verb they used is a valid English verb.

Your heart is in the right place, but relying on what Wikipedia calls a fallacy and on implicit "natural rights" both undermine your argument severely. Your fourth paragraph is far and away the most valuable one.

AfD polls lower than Trump, did any of those others poll higher?

It's more like 30% and that's with Americans being some of the most wildly mis-educated people out there. I'm sick of seeing sortition shit, but sicker still of misanthropy.

christo-jihad

"What are we, a bunch of Muslims?"

In a country with many vocal boot lickers ("play stupid games . . .") it seems like a fair term to have in your lexicon

Slave labor didn't stop being integral element after the Civil War. It was scaled back, but it's still both locally an integral element of the economies of many states (via prison labor, to say nothing of how under-the-table migrant dealings go) and via imperialism, etc. used abroad.

I'm not attacking Smith. The "invisible hand" thing is silly and short-sighted, but his work more broadly was the foundation for Marx economically. I'm attacking capitalism as it has existed in history, where it has virtually always used slave labor as an integral element.

Can you not try to construct a syllogism for me? Stating one obvious fact is not an argument.

You're asking me to make your argument for you. Use you words.

People frame it so innocently as "uwu the smol bean Jews just want a state" to be obfuscatory of the fact that it is an ethnostate, a thing that categorically shouldn't exist. Not only that, it's an expansionist and evidently exterminationist one at that.