ExLisper

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that a real game?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (33 children)

Why TF is IBM advertising on X? They sell mainframes. Who is scrolling through X and thinks 'shit, I could really use a mainframe'?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

1.5m in Spain. Super rare for anyone to get closer and if it does it's probably a tourist. All drivers will just follow you until it's safe to pass even if you're going uphill.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

... and first deadly air taxi accident by 2027.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or imagine Death Note but it falls in the hands of Elon Musk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I've just looked it up and as I've said: extinguisher can last up to 20 years and you only have to check the gas pressure and if there is any psychical damage. But I know that in old extinguishers the powder inside could clamp up and proper way to use it was to shake it first. Hasn't been the case for quite some time now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

In my apartment building there's an extinguisher on every floor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think that's true anymore. It used to be the case in older types that the powder inside would clamp after some time but the new powders don't do it. You just have to make sure that the gas is still pressurized inside.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

People using X window manage will just keep using them. Wayland doesn't offer anything valuable to most users so people will just keep using the managers they like. In 10-20 years we will get some nice, new managers that naturally will support Wayland and people will switch because of the features, not because 'X insecure, Wayland awesome' BS.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This. And the guy who did it was fat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not arguing it's not going to affect the globe at scale (even though you would have to cover shitload of building in this to affect it). I'm saying that we know what the effect would be: it would cool it down.

What you fail to understand is that if solar radiation hits a dark surface, like a roof, this energy is transferred to earth. That's it. It's here. Now it's really difficult to get rid of it. Greenhouse gases make this even more difficult.

But if solar radiation hits a white surface SOME of this energy will be reflected back to space. Not ALL of it, some of will still stay here but overall it will LESS energy.

Greenhouse gasses trap the radiation emitted by earth as heat, not the reflected light. Think about it. If greenhouse gases reflected light then we would get less light from the sun, right? Part of it would be reflected. They don't do that. They let light pass through and stop the heat radiated from earth. If you reflect light instead of trapping it that's a good thing.

This is so basic I'm starting to suspect you're just trolling so I will end this conversation here...

view more: ‹ prev next ›